From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Pasha Bolokhov <pasha.bolokhov@gmail.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve function dir.c:trim_trailing_spaces()
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 11:45:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqa99z9kbz.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140530020444.GH28683@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 29 May 2014 22:04:44 -0400")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 02:34:33PM -0700, Pasha Bolokhov wrote:
>
>> > However, I doubt it makes that much of a difference in practice, so
>> > unless it's measurable, I would certainly go with the version that is
>> > more readable (and correct, of course).
>>
>> Sorry, just to recap, you would go with the existing version
>> (which needs correction), or with the one that is being suggested? (I
>> agree I can format the style a tiny bit better in the latter one)
>
> I actually think the original left-to-right is a little easier to
> follow, but I do not feel strongly. I mainly meant "argue based on
> readability and correctness, do not argue based on speed".
Sensible.
> I'd be OK with either, though I have a slight preference for the first,
> just because I find the "bslash ^= 1" bit of yours, while clever, a bit
> hard to follow.
FWIW, I think I agree.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-30 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-28 23:45 [PATCH] Improve function dir.c:trim_trailing_spaces() Pasha Bolokhov
2014-05-29 20:13 ` Jeff King
2014-05-29 21:34 ` Pasha Bolokhov
2014-05-30 2:04 ` Jeff King
2014-05-30 18:45 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-05-31 15:21 Pasha Bolokhov
2014-06-02 6:47 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqa99z9kbz.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasha.bolokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.