All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>,
	 git@vger.kernel.org,  Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] midx: stop repeatedly looking up nonexistent packfiles
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 08:47:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqbjrk7ikx.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250522053235.GB1134267@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 22 May 2025 01:32:35 -0400")

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> @@ -460,6 +462,8 @@ int prepare_midx_pack(struct repository *r, struct multi_pack_index *m,
>  
>  	if (m->packs[pack_int_id])
>  		return 0;
> +	if (m->pack_errs[pack_int_id])
> +		return 1;
>  
>  	strbuf_addf(&pack_name, "%s/pack/%s", m->object_dir,
>  		    m->pack_names[pack_int_id]);
> @@ -482,8 +486,10 @@ int prepare_midx_pack(struct repository *r, struct multi_pack_index *m,
>  	strbuf_release(&pack_name);
>  	strbuf_release(&key);
>  
> -	if (!p)
> +	if (!p) {
> +		m->pack_errs[pack_int_id] = 1;
>  		return 1;
> +	}
>  
>  	p->multi_pack_index = 1;
>  	m->packs[pack_int_id] = p;
>
> You could even lazy-malloc the extra array if you wanted to optimize the
> common no-errors case, but I'm not sure it's a big deal.

So the idea is to leave m->packs[] for unused pack NULL instead of
magic value, so that users of that array do not need to check?

I think that is a lot safer than the magic "we know this fails"
value that existing callers that have long trusted that a non-NULL
.packs[] element is a valid pack.

By the way, I suspect I am not reading the code correctly, but I am
not sure what fill_midx_entry() does with a failed case.

	midx_for_object(&m, pos);
	pack_int_id = nth_midxed_pack_int_id(m, pos);

	if (prepare_midx_pack(r, m, pack_int_id))
		return 0;

With or without cached failure, this should return 0 when and only
when m->packs[pack_int_id] is a usable pack.  But what about the
access on the next line?

	p = m->packs[pack_int_id - m->num_packs_in_base];

Do we have any guarantee that we called prepare_midx_pack() for 
the pack at (pack_int_id - m->num_packs_in_base)th slot?  Can p
be NULL here?  And with the magic "we know this fails" value, can p
be that magic value?

	/*
	* We are about to tell the caller where they can locate the
	* requested object.  We better make sure the packfile is
	* still here and can be accessed before supplying that
	* answer, as it may have been deleted since the MIDX was
	* loaded!
	*/
	if (!is_pack_valid(p))
		return 0;

That value is passed to is_pack_valid(), which I do not think even
takes NULL.

Puzzled.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-22 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-16  8:55 [PATCH] packfile: avoid access(3p) calls for missing packs Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-16 18:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-19  6:52   ` Jeff King
2025-05-19 15:46     ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-20  6:45     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-22  5:28       ` Jeff King
2025-05-23  1:02     ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-23  2:03       ` Jeff King
2025-05-20  9:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-20  9:53   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] packfile: explain ordering of how we look up auxiliary pack files Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-23  1:03     ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-20  9:53   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] midx: stop repeatedly looking up nonexistent packfiles Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-22  5:32     ` Jeff King
2025-05-22 15:47       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-05-22 16:59         ` Jeff King
2025-05-22 18:44           ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-23  1:22           ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-23  2:08             ` Jeff King
2025-05-23 17:46               ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-25 18:41                 ` [PATCH 0/5] midx: improve prepare_midx_pack() ergonomics Taylor Blau
2025-05-25 18:41                   ` [PATCH 1/5] pack-bitmap.c: fix broken warning() when missing MIDX'd pack Taylor Blau
2025-05-26  7:23                     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-28  2:00                       ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-25 18:41                   ` [PATCH 2/5] midx-write.c: guard against incremental MIDXs in want_included_pack() Taylor Blau
2025-05-26  7:23                     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-28  2:08                       ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-25 18:41                   ` [PATCH 3/5] midx-write.c: simplify fill_packs_from_midx() Taylor Blau
2025-05-26  7:23                     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-28  2:15                       ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-25 18:42                   ` [PATCH 4/5] midx-write.c: extract inner loop from fill_packs_from_midx() Taylor Blau
2025-05-25 18:42                   ` [PATCH 5/5] midx: return a `packed_git` pointer from `prepare_midx_pack()` Taylor Blau
2025-05-26  7:24                     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-28  2:18                       ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-28 11:53                         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-28 22:58                   ` [PATCH v2 0/4] midx: improve prepare_midx_pack() ergonomics Taylor Blau
2025-05-28 22:59                     ` [PATCH v2 1/4] midx: access pack names through `nth_midxed_pack_name()` Taylor Blau
2025-05-29 20:47                       ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-03 22:22                         ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-29 20:51                       ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-03 22:23                         ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-28 22:59                     ` [PATCH v2 2/4] midx-write.c: guard against incremental MIDXs in want_included_pack() Taylor Blau
2025-05-28 22:59                     ` [PATCH v2 3/4] midx-write.c: extract inner loop from fill_packs_from_midx() Taylor Blau
2025-05-28 22:59                     ` [PATCH v2 4/4] midx: return a `packed_git` pointer from `prepare_midx_pack()` Taylor Blau
2025-05-30  6:50                       ` Jeff King
2025-06-03 22:27                         ` Taylor Blau
2025-08-28 23:25                           ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-23  1:31       ` [PATCH v2 2/2] midx: stop repeatedly looking up nonexistent packfiles Taylor Blau
2025-05-23  2:18         ` Jeff King
2025-05-21 13:24   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] packfile: avoid access(3p) calls for missing packs Junio C Hamano
2025-05-28 12:24 ` [PATCH v3 " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-28 12:24   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] packfile: explain ordering of how we look up auxiliary pack files Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-28 12:24   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] midx: stop repeatedly looking up nonexistent packfiles Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-30  6:27   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] packfile: avoid access(3p) calls for missing packs Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqbjrk7ikx.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.