All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Cc: "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Johannes Schindelin" <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] range-diff: refactor check for commit range
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:59:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqbldg7hvb.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0ce0953a-92b2-2ce6-1e13-6f6240933ce1@gmail.com> (Phillip Wood's message of "Fri, 22 Jan 2021 19:12:54 +0000")

Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes:

>>   +static int is_range(const char *range)
>> +{
>> +	return !!strstr(range, "..");
>> +}
>
> If the user wrongly passes two arguments referring to single commits
> with `:/<text>` or `@{/<text>}` where text contains ".." this will
> give a false positive.

True.  I do not think this aims to be complete revision parser in
the first place, though.

It is tempting to at least idly speculate if an approach to run
setup_revisions() on argument is_range() takes and checking the
result would yield a more practical solution.  I would imagine that
we would want to see in the resulting revs.pending has at least one
positive and one negative, and none of them have SYMMETRIC_LEFT set
in their .flags word.

    Side note: Strictly speaking, people could wish "rev" to mean
               "everything reachable from the rev, down to root", so
               requiring one negative may technically be a wrong
               thing, but in the context of "range-diff", I am not
               sure how useful such a behaviour would be.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-22 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-21 22:20 [PATCH 0/3] Range diff with ranges lacking dotdot Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-21 22:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] range-diff: refactor check for commit range Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-21 23:27   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-22 19:12   ` Phillip Wood
2021-01-22 21:59     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2021-01-23 15:59       ` Phillip Wood
2021-01-26 15:19         ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-01-21 22:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] range-diff: handle commit ranges other than A..B Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-21 23:37   ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-22 16:12     ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-01-21 23:42   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-22 16:20     ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-01-21 22:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] range-diff(docs): explain how to specify commit ranges Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-21 23:46   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-22 16:21     ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-01-22 18:21       ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-27  3:01         ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-01-28  5:43           ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-22 18:20   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-01-26 15:22     ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-01-22  7:31 ` [PATCH 0/3] Range diff with ranges lacking dotdot Uwe Kleine-König
2021-01-22 18:16 ` [PATCH v2 " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-22 18:16   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] range-diff/format-patch: refactor check for commit range Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-22 20:27     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-25  7:35       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-01-25 19:24         ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-25 21:25           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-01-26 19:25             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-22 18:16   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] range-diff/format-patch: handle commit ranges other than A..B Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-22 20:32     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-27  2:57       ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-01-28  5:57         ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-28 15:38           ` Johannes Schindelin
     [not found]             ` <xmqqim7gx41d.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
2021-02-06  0:39               ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-01-22 18:16   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] range-diff(docs): explain how to specify commit ranges Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-27 16:37   ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Range diff with ranges lacking dotdot Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-27 16:37     ` [PATCH v3 1/3] range-diff/format-patch: refactor check for commit range Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-27 16:37     ` [PATCH v3 2/3] range-diff/format-patch: handle commit ranges other than A..B Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-27 16:37     ` [PATCH v3 3/3] range-diff(docs): explain how to specify commit ranges Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-04  9:31     ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Range diff with ranges lacking dotdot Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-04  9:31       ` [PATCH v4 1/3] range-diff/format-patch: refactor check for commit range Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-04 18:56         ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-04 19:27           ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-02-04  9:31       ` [PATCH v4 2/3] range-diff/format-patch: handle commit ranges other than A..B Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-04 18:51         ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-04 21:42           ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-02-04 18:58         ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-04 21:57           ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-02-04  9:31       ` [PATCH v4 3/3] range-diff(docs): explain how to specify commit ranges Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-04 18:53         ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-04 21:58           ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-02-04 22:42             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-04 23:29       ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Range diff with ranges lacking dotdot Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-04 23:29         ` [PATCH v5 1/3] range-diff/format-patch: refactor check for commit range Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-04 23:29         ` [PATCH v5 2/3] range-diff/format-patch: handle commit ranges other than A..B Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-05  1:07           ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-05  1:32             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-05 14:09               ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-02-04 23:29         ` [PATCH v5 3/3] range-diff(docs): explain how to specify commit ranges Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-05 14:44         ` [PATCH v6 0/3] Range diff with ranges lacking dotdot Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-05 14:44           ` [PATCH v6 1/3] range-diff/format-patch: refactor check for commit range Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-05 14:44           ` [PATCH v6 2/3] range-diff/format-patch: handle commit ranges other than A..B Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-05 14:44           ` [PATCH v6 3/3] range-diff(docs): explain how to specify commit ranges Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqbldg7hvb.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.