From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9C42035F for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 22:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761920AbcJ1WZZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:25:25 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:51446 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755086AbcJ1WZZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:25:25 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A4B4ACF9; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:25:23 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=rdGI6eJy2q8wxDU2dpsrdDMgLFo=; b=O9vsvE SO+Q6lyrayrCs6gSSpfclVKGwzFaDBtLY3cst8YeVx1jBvyHDObKjmBN3JanO2cr 8O1NNrULzQ/Ts56Y0pNH5VE1StcPclmQSeW41SsD+vwU3jDWpQQY5T/Oc1BMlX6g dyB5nJyYgpaUU6Wcs081+yd4tQxFVhVcHn+ss= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=jSjKOvRa4iFYuinJy6BfAWHNkCvLI9Xx mCIUeH8jlKbAYp5BxSYOxaeRWNkFmo24Rs7pNJ0OJ69ft8t9lDZNS2MOGujakkU+ lEeTOXjTsLIGe3KjQUq5fmA5M23LcPmvle84Y1HRZ6k9ns6eo9MX7WDJxCPLj8pw WmAXxfqlwY0= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9DB54ACF8; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:25:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4085F4ACF7; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:25:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Stefan Beller Cc: Johannes Sixt , Brandon Williams , Duy Nguyen , "git\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 27/36] attr: convert to new threadsafe API References: <20161028185502.8789-1-sbeller@google.com> <20161028185502.8789-28-sbeller@google.com> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:25:21 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Beller's message of "Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:08:44 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6AED4962-9D5D-11E6-9789-3AB77A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Stefan Beller writes: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Probably this needs to be squashed in, now the MinGW discussion has >> settled. > > I was about to propose this (and resend it non-rebased). > > So I do not resend, but rather ask you to squash this patch? That's OK. I've queued a "SQUASH???" separately for now and if we need futher changes, you may want to resend, but I can locally squash before merging it down to 'next' if it turns out that there is no more changes necessary. Thanks.