From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Halil Öztürk" <halilozturk55@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Feature Request: Passing a number as an option to git tags for displaying latest tags
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:17:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqbnf4rohs.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALpYpjE1WE=fO0q=rGPHedZwP8JovJ0CxELBd_EhAmncRS6ZYA@mail.gmail.com> ("Halil Öztürk"'s message of "Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:17:45 -0400")
Halil Öztürk <halilozturk55@gmail.com> writes:
> Passing a number as an option to "git tags" command should display latest tags.
>
> e.g. "git tags -5" will display last 5 tags only.
I think this conflates two unrelated things.
- Ordering tags not by refnames (i.e. default) but by "time".
- Limiting the output by count.
The latter is what "| head -n 5" and/or "| tail -n 5" are for, so it
would be at most "nice to have"; I am indifferent in the sense that
I won't work on it, but I'd take a look if somebody sent a patch
that was cleanly done.
The former, sort by "time", is interesting, but you need to define
what to do with various corner cases. For example, some people may
be have one or more of the following desires:
* My project did not use tags for a long time, and started using it
recently starting from v1.1.0. The first release only said
"Frotz version 1.0.0" in its commit log message. I retroactively
did "git tag -s -m 'Frotz 1.1.0' v1.1.0" on that commit.
In such a case, it is likely that I would want the sorting done
based on the committer date on the underlying commit, not the
tag's tagger date.
* When a bug is found, it is customary in my project to add a
"break-<something>" tag to the commit that introduces the bug
(and "fix-<something>" tag to the commit that fixes it).
When I want to find recently discovered breakages, I want the
tags whose names match "break-*" sorted by tagger dates, not the
underlying commit's committer dates.
The necessary ordering machinery to do the above already exists in
"for-each-ref". There is a GSoC project that works to unify various
features spread across "for-each-ref", "branch -l" and "tag -l" and
make them available to all of the three.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-22 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-22 17:17 Feature Request: Passing a number as an option to git tags for displaying latest tags Halil Öztürk
2015-07-22 18:36 ` Jacob Keller
2015-07-22 18:58 ` Andreas Schwab
2015-07-22 19:17 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2015-07-22 19:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-07-23 9:39 ` Michael J Gruber
2015-07-23 17:21 ` Jacob Keller
2015-07-23 18:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-07-23 18:12 ` Jacob Keller
2015-07-23 18:21 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqbnf4rohs.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=halilozturk55@gmail.com \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.