All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, David Turner <dturner@twitter.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] builtin/clean.c: Handle disappearing files
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 15:14:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqbnhmiz78.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431640373.17436.16.camel@ubuntu> (David Turner's message of "Thu, 14 May 2015 17:52:53 -0400")

David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com> writes:

>> For this change to be an improvement that matters, you must be
>> allowing some other process mucking around with the files in your
>> working tree when you run "git clean".  The original catches such
>> situation as an anomaly that the user would want to be aware of (and
>> investigate), but this patch essentially declares that having such a
>> random process touching your working tree from sideways is a normal
>> situation.  I do not think I am willing to make such a declaration
>> myself; I'd rather want to know why other people are touching my
>> working tree while I am working in it.
>
> Our build tool[1] stores statistics in a hidden file in the working
> tree.  After it runs, it daemonizes and uploads those stats, and then
> deletes the stats file.  Because the upload might take some time, the
> user might run git clean in the meantime.  (I think there might be some
> other deletion that happens in the background too; I haven't really
> investigated).
>
> Of course, in interactive use, very little harm is done if clean dies
> here: the user simply must notice that the clean has failed and retry
> it.  But in non-interactive use, scripts could fail.
>
> At least, I think that's what could be causing us to hit this error; I
> haven't actually done any research to see if this is true.

I find that the above argues that this patch is a bad idea.

The change sweeps the problem under the rug, killing the canary in
the mine, instead of motivating you to figure out why it is
happening to you.

Of course, scripts could choose to ignore errors from "git clean" it
runs.  At that point, the "sweeping under the rug" ugliness is not
in Git, which is better ;-).

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-14 22:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-14 21:16 [PATCH] builtin/clean.c: Handle disappearing files David Turner
2015-05-14 21:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-14 21:52   ` David Turner
2015-05-14 22:14     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2015-05-14 22:33       ` David Turner
2015-05-15  5:26         ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-15 18:13           ` David Turner
2015-05-16 19:21             ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqbnhmiz78.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=dturner@twitter.com \
    --cc=dturner@twopensource.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.