All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Cc: Benoit Pierre <benoit.pierre@gmail.com>, Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] test patch hunk editing with "commit -p -m"
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 11:13:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqbnxcr4bl.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cQoUW5dqSzs-wAVOD1xrbSzuzGoHCDKdmgT_BprngMbvQ@mail.gmail.com> (Eric Sunshine's message of "Mon, 10 Mar 2014 16:20:59 -0400")

Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:

> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Benoit Pierre <benoit.pierre@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Add (failing) test: with commit changing the environment to let hooks
>> now that no editor will be used (by setting GIT_EDITOR to ":"), the
>> "edit hunk" functionality does not work (no editor is launched and the
>> whole hunk is committed).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benoit Pierre <benoit.pierre@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  t/t7513-commit_-p_-m_hunk_edit.sh | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100755 t/t7513-commit_-p_-m_hunk_edit.sh
>
> Is it possible to give this file a name less unusual and more
> consistent with other test scripts? Perhaps choose a more generic name
> which may allow other similar tests to be added to the file in the
> future (if needed)?

Surely.  There are "reset-patch" and "checkout-patch" tests, and if
we were to add something like this, I'd imagine "commit-patch" would
be a logical name for the new test.

>> diff --git a/t/t7513-commit_-p_-m_hunk_edit.sh b/t/t7513-commit_-p_-m_hunk_edit.sh
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 0000000..994939a
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/t/t7513-commit_-p_-m_hunk_edit.sh
>> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
>> +#!/bin/sh
>> +
>> +test_description='hunk edit with "commit -p -m"'
>> +. ./test-lib.sh
>> +
>> +if ! test_have_prereq PERL
>> +then
>> +       skip_all="skipping '$test_description' tests, perl not available"
>> +       test_done
>> +fi
>> +
>> +test_expect_success 'setup (initial)' '
>> +       echo line1 >file &&
>> +       git add file &&
>> +       git commit -m commit1 &&
>> +       echo line3 >>file &&
>> +       cat >expect <<-\EOF
>> +       diff --git a/file b/file
>> +       index a29bdeb..c0d0fb4 100644
>> +       --- a/file
>> +       +++ b/file
>> +       @@ -1 +1,2 @@
>> +        line1
>> +       +line2
>> +       EOF
>
> In the previous review, the suggestion was that creation of 'expect'
> should be moved to the test below where it is actually used rather
> than into the 'setup' phase above.
>
>> +'
>> +
>> +test_expect_failure 'edit hunk "commit -p -m message"' '
>> +       echo e | env GIT_EDITOR="sed s/+line3\$/+line2/ -i" git commit -p -m commit2 file &&
>> +       git diff HEAD^ HEAD >actual &&
>> +       test_cmp expect actual
>> +'
>> +
>> +test_done
>> --
>> 1.9.0

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-11 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-10 18:49 [PATCH V2 0/7] fix hunk editing with 'commit -p -m' Benoit Pierre
2014-03-10 18:49 ` [PATCH 1/7] merge hook tests: fix missing '&&' in test Benoit Pierre
2014-03-10 18:49 ` [PATCH 2/7] merge hook tests: use 'test_must_fail' instead of '!' Benoit Pierre
2014-03-10 18:49 ` [PATCH 3/7] test patch hunk editing with "commit -p -m" Benoit Pierre
2014-03-10 20:20   ` Eric Sunshine
2014-03-11 18:13     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2014-03-10 20:30   ` Philip Oakley
2014-03-11 21:03   ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-15 12:28     ` Torsten Bögershausen
2014-03-15 16:11       ` Benoit Pierre
2014-03-15 21:00         ` Torsten Bögershausen
2014-03-15 21:42         ` [PATCH 1/7] merge hook tests: fix missing '&&' in test Benoit Pierre
2014-03-15 21:42           ` [PATCH 2/7] merge hook tests: use 'test_must_fail' instead of '!' Benoit Pierre
2014-03-15 21:42           ` [PATCH 3/7] test patch hunk editing with "commit -p -m" Benoit Pierre
2014-03-17 18:49             ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-17 19:46               ` Benoit Pierre
2014-03-17 19:51                 ` Eric Sunshine
2014-03-17 19:53                   ` Benoit Pierre
2014-03-17 21:33                 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-17 18:53             ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-17 19:52               ` Benoit Pierre
2014-03-17 21:35                 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-18 10:00               ` [PATCH 1/7] merge hook tests: fix missing '&&' in test Benoit Pierre
2014-03-18 10:00                 ` [PATCH 2/7] merge hook tests: use 'test_must_fail' instead of '!' Benoit Pierre
2014-03-18 10:00                 ` [PATCH 3/7] test patch hunk editing with "commit -p -m" Benoit Pierre
2014-03-18 10:00                 ` [PATCH 4/7] commit: fix " Benoit Pierre
2014-03-19  7:32                   ` Torsten Bögershausen
2014-03-19 17:19                     ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-18 10:00                 ` [PATCH 5/7] merge: fix GIT_EDITOR override for commit hook Benoit Pierre
2014-03-18 10:00                 ` [PATCH 6/7] merge hook tests: fix and update tests Benoit Pierre
2014-03-18 10:00                 ` [PATCH 7/7] run-command: mark run_hook_with_custom_index as deprecated Benoit Pierre
2014-03-18 18:27                 ` [PATCH 1/7] merge hook tests: fix missing '&&' in test Junio C Hamano
2014-03-15 21:42           ` [PATCH 4/7] commit: fix patch hunk editing with "commit -p -m" Benoit Pierre
2014-03-15 21:42           ` [PATCH 5/7] merge: fix GIT_EDITOR override for commit hook Benoit Pierre
2014-03-15 21:42           ` [PATCH 6/7] merge hook tests: fix and update tests Benoit Pierre
2014-03-15 21:42           ` [PATCH 7/7] run-command: mark run_hook_with_custom_index as deprecated Benoit Pierre
2014-03-10 18:49 ` [PATCH 4/7] commit: fix patch hunk editing with "commit -p -m" Benoit Pierre
2014-03-10 20:07   ` Jeff King
2014-03-11  0:45     ` Jun Hao
2014-03-11 17:56     ` Benoit Pierre
2014-03-11 18:00       ` Jeff King
2014-03-11 18:40         ` [PATCH 4/7] commit: fix patch hunk editing with Jun Hao
2014-03-11 21:02   ` [PATCH 4/7] commit: fix patch hunk editing with "commit -p -m" Junio C Hamano
2014-03-10 18:49 ` [PATCH 5/7] merge: fix GIT_EDITOR override for commit hook Benoit Pierre
2014-03-10 18:49 ` [PATCH 6/7] merge hook tests: fix and update tests Benoit Pierre
2014-03-10 20:27   ` Eric Sunshine
2014-03-10 18:49 ` [PATCH 7/7] run-command: mark run_hook_with_custom_index as deprecated Benoit Pierre
2014-03-11  1:00   ` brian m. carlson
2014-03-11 17:37     ` Benoit Pierre
2014-04-03 22:11 ` [PATCH V2 0/7] fix hunk editing with 'commit -p -m' Jonathan Nieder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqbnxcr4bl.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=benoit.pierre@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.