From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Mansi Singh via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Mansi Singh <mansimaanu8627@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] repo: remove redundant variable shadow in stats_table_print_structure
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 20:08:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqcy1cz8hw.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.2062.git.1773109018.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Mansi Singh via GitGitGadget's message of "Tue, 10 Mar 2026 02:16:56 +0000")
"Mansi Singh via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> The variable i is declared in the outer scope of
> stats_table_print_structure() and then re-declared inside the loop,
> shadowing the outer one unnecessarily. Remove the redundant inner
> declaration to clean up the scope.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mansi Singh mansimaanu8627@gmail.com
The above sounds more like a description for a single patch, not a
cover letter.
Because we strongly encourage one patch doing only one thing and
doing it well, a commit log message for one of the patches in a
two-patch series rarely makes a good description for the whole
series.
But reading it again, which variable 'i' is it talking about? [2/2]
does address 'entry' that is declared in an inner scope, masking the
variable with the same name declared in an outer scope.
Stepping back a bit, I do not quite see the need for these two
patcches to form a single topic. They look pretty much totally
independent topics. Perhaps you're better off treating them as two
independent topics, each with a single patch.
> Mansi (1):
> t7605: use test_path_is_file instead of test -f
>
> Mansi Singh (1):
> repo: remove redundant variable shadow in stats_table_print_structure
Are these two patches from two different people?
Last time in https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqv7fjw6yx.fsf@gitster.g/
we had three names, and we now have only two, so that can be called
an improvement, but let's whittle them down to just one ;-).
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-10 3:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-10 2:16 [PATCH 0/2] repo: remove redundant variable shadow in stats_table_print_structure Mansi Singh via GitGitGadget
2026-03-10 2:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] t7605: use test_path_is_file instead of test -f Mansi via GitGitGadget
2026-03-10 2:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] repo: remove redundant variable shadow in stats_table_print_structure Mansi Singh via GitGitGadget
2026-03-10 13:08 ` [PATCH 0/2] " K Jayatheerth
2026-03-10 3:08 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqcy1cz8hw.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=mansimaanu8627@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.