From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>,
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] diff: check range before dereferencing an array element
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 12:39:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqcycu69ky.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.1887.v3.git.1745926679028.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget's message of "Tue, 29 Apr 2025 11:37:58 +0000")
"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
writes:
> From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
>
> Before accessing an array element at a given index, it should be
> verified that the index is within the desired bounds, not afterwards,
> otherwise it may not make sense to even access the array element in the
> first place. This is the point of CodeQL's
> `cpp/offset-use-before-range-check` rule.
>
> This CodeQL rule unfortunately is also triggered by the
> `fill_es_indent_data()` code, even though the condition `off < len - 1`
> does not even need to guarantee that the offset is in bounds (`s` points
> to a NUL-terminated string, for which `s[off] == '\r'` would fail before
> running out of bounds).
>
> Let's work around this rare false positive to help us use an otherwise
> mostly useful tool is a worthy thing to do.
Thanks. I have almost forgotten about this one. The above
explanation works very well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-29 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-26 17:26 [PATCH 0/2] Range-check array index before access Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-03-26 17:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] diff: check range before dereferencing an array element Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-03-27 11:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-27 14:59 ` Phillip Wood
2025-03-26 17:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] read-cache: " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-03-26 18:02 ` Jeff King
2025-03-27 11:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Range-check array index before access Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-03-27 11:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] diff: check range before dereferencing an array element Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-03-28 2:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-27 11:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] read-cache: " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-03-28 5:49 ` Jeff King
2025-04-11 14:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-29 11:37 ` [PATCH v3] diff: " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-04-29 19:39 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-04-29 21:58 ` Jeff King
2025-04-29 22:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-29 23:33 ` Jeff King
2025-04-29 23:46 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqcycu69ky.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.