Re: Bug in merge-ort (rename detection can have collisions?)

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes:

> On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 5:11 PM Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> (I'm not 100% what the bug _is_, only that there is one.)
>>
>> = Report
>>
>> At $DAYJOB, there was a report that "git merge" was failing on certain
>> branches. Fortunately, the repo is publicly accessible, so I can share
>> the full reproduction recipe:
>> ...
> Thanks for the detailed report; very cool.  Interestingly, if you
> reverse the direction of the merge (checkout origin/upstream-master
> and merge origin/master) then you get a different error:
> ...
> Anyway, long story short...I don't have a fix yet, but just thought
> I'd mention I saw the email and spent some hours digging in.

Thanks for continued support for the ort strategy.  From the very
beginning, I was hesitant to make our tools try to be too clever
with excessive heuristics, but at least we are not making a silent
mismerge in this case, so it is probably OK, especially with "-s
recursive" still left as an escape hatch.