From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fmt-merge-msg: avoid leaking strbuf in shortlog()
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 10:37:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqd13p83sb.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1654a696-73d5-c9ef-0fc2-bd82aaf2cabb@web.de> ("René Scharfe"'s message of "Fri, 8 Dec 2017 18:29:34 +0100")
René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> writes:
>> I'm not sure it's string-list's fault. Many callers (including this one)
>> ...
> The two modes (dup/nodup) make string_list code tricky. Not sure
> how far we'd get with something simpler (e.g. an array of char pointers),
> but having the caller do all string allocations would make the code
> easier to analyze.
Yes.
It probably would have been more sensible if the API did not have
two modes (instead, have the caller pass whatever string to be
stored, *and* make the caller responsible for freeing them *if* it
passed an allocated string).
For the push_refs_with_push() patch you sent, another possible fix
would be to make cas_options a nodup kind so that the result of
strbuf_detach() does not get an extra strdup to be lost when placed
in cas_options. With the current string-list API that would not
quite work, because freeing done in _release() is tied to the
"dup/nodup" ness of the string list. I think there even is a
codepath that initializes a string_list as nodup kind, stuffs string
in it giving the ownership, and then flips it into dup kind just
before calling _release() only to have it free the strings, or
something silly/ugly like that.
In any case, the patch looks sensible. Thanks for plugging the
leaks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-08 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-07 20:22 [PATCH] fmt-merge-msg: avoid leaking strbuf in shortlog() René Scharfe
2017-12-07 21:27 ` Jeff King
2017-12-08 17:29 ` René Scharfe
2017-12-08 18:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-12-08 20:10 ` René Scharfe
2017-12-08 21:11 ` Jeff King
2017-12-07 21:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-12-08 10:14 ` Jeff King
2017-12-08 17:29 ` René Scharfe
2017-12-08 18:37 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-12-08 21:28 ` Jeff King
2017-12-18 19:18 ` René Scharfe
2017-12-19 11:38 ` Jeff King
2017-12-19 18:26 ` René Scharfe
2017-12-20 13:05 ` Jeff King
2017-12-08 21:17 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqd13p83sb.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=l.s.r@web.de \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.