From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF0B20C32 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 23:06:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751815AbdLFXGi (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2017 18:06:38 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:58018 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751598AbdLFXGi (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2017 18:06:38 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED85B3ED9; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 18:06:37 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=naVL6BFwadbV0UKTC3RYKE+qR58=; b=xf2tll KeEtnwF8CaYud42pEteaex45XTPwLcAJjmdaIOFuwVH714cHH0xM5bRdCDZWMgAK IqPqpqbCvBippDxh17ve0PqTWZzvfIh4/u4rn24qkQcv4XrrkfsNnCzITy+fFyQ1 q4v8Dpl23uux+bKVToNYGU9CbLA3/zqW5wKdA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=bh28YQbhfTZDx+77I7vEWZb2sYNpV8sV PHN9fo00VdkIXmoIwhxO9maT2jr1xO8Xfx5EC48OZKEY6N3L61iumwEpxM3vqgJZ VG6JuUDhpYbqoRMCmY0d+4GqBii94ViB+iB15Rr60r0LcnuwjCEwTWLw3d24yC5P dWRNIEX0QP0= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7675BB3ED8; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 18:06:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1AD4B3ED7; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 18:06:36 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Nathan PAYRE Cc: Nathan Payre , Git Mailing List , Matthieu Moy , Timothee Albertin , Daniel Bensoussan Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] send-email: extract email-parsing code into a subroutine References: <20171206153821.24435-1-nathan.payre@etu.univ-lyon1.fr> Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 15:06:35 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Nathan PAYRE's message of "Wed, 6 Dec 2017 23:55:09 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1C39FB6A-DADA-11E7-B949-575F0C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Nathan PAYRE writes: > Junio C Hamano : writes: > >> ... throughout this patch, not limited to this section, indentation >> is strange and there seem to be many "print" that show messages that >> do not seem to be meant for end-user consumption. I can see that >> this aspires to improve the readability, but not quite yet ;-). > > Hmmm I'm wondering who place thoses print in my code ! > I will fix it fast. :-) Don't make waste by being hasty, though. The print statements were bad, but funny indentation was more distracting and will be worse hindrance from the maintainabaility's point of view. Thanks.