From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Cc: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>,
Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>,
"git\@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Submodule regression in 2.14?
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 19:13:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqd17tei7m.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79kb-ReME6qbDy-Q12-d=B=f6odUW_D1bAmegP4AY2AyntQ@mail.gmail.com> (Stefan Beller's message of "Thu, 17 Aug 2017 14:55:27 -0700")
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:
> Are you saying this might be a design mistake and
> the .update ought to be respected by all the other
> commands? For example
> git reset --recurse-submodules
> should ignore the .update= none?
I have been under the impression that that has been the traditional
desire of what .update ought to mean. I personally do not have a
strong opinion---at least not yet.
> When designing these new recursive submodule functionality
> outside the "submodule" command, I'd want submodules
> to behave as much as possible like trees.
I think that is sensible as long as the user does not explicitly say
"this and that submodule behave differently" by giving configuration
variables. Perhaps .update is one of those that should countermand
the default behaviour of "--recurse-submodules"?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-18 2:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-16 18:35 Submodule regression in 2.14? Lars Schneider
2017-08-16 18:51 ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-16 18:53 ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-17 21:21 ` Lars Schneider
2017-08-17 21:55 ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-18 2:13 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-08-18 4:02 ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-18 16:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-08-18 19:09 ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-19 6:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-08-21 16:05 ` Heiko Voigt
2017-08-21 16:42 ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-22 15:33 ` Heiko Voigt
2017-08-22 18:10 ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-25 9:10 ` Heiko Voigt
2017-08-25 16:38 ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-25 16:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-08-21 16:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-08-22 15:50 ` Heiko Voigt
2017-08-21 16:46 ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-21 22:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-08-18 13:12 ` Lars Schneider
2017-08-18 17:16 ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-18 19:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-08-18 22:04 ` [PATCH] pull: respect submodule update configuration Stefan Beller
2017-08-18 22:05 ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-19 6:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-08-19 6:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-08-21 16:20 ` Heiko Voigt
2017-08-21 16:55 ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-21 17:20 ` Lars Schneider
2017-08-21 17:48 ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-21 18:21 ` Brandon Williams
2017-08-21 22:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-08-22 14:50 ` Lars Schneider
2017-08-22 17:51 ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-22 18:55 ` Brandon Williams
2017-08-19 18:24 ` Submodule regression in 2.14? Lars Schneider
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqd17tei7m.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=bmwill@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=larsxschneider@gmail.com \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.