Re: [PATCH 5/6] rev-list: check reflog_info before showing usage

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> When git-rev-list sees no pending commits, it shows a usage
> message. This works even when reflog-walking is requested,
> because the reflog-walk code currently puts the reflog tips
> into the pending queue.
>
> In preparation for refactoring the reflog-walk code, let's
> explicitly check whether we have any reflogs to walk. For
> now this is a noop, but the existing reflog tests will make
> sure that it kicks in after the refactoring. Likewise, we'll
> add a test that "rev-list -g" without specifying any reflogs
> continues to fail (so that we know our check does not kick
> in too aggressively).
>
> Note that the implementation needs to go into its own
> sub-function, as the walk code does not expose its innards
> outside of reflog-walk.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
> ---
> This is actually the main "gotcha" I'm worried about with this series.
> I'm not sure if any other code would care about seeing the pending items
> in revs->commits. I still think the series is the right direction; if
> there is such a place, we'd want to teach it to handle reflog walking in
> a similar way, too.

Ah, very good thinking---when I was following along your drafts to
bypass the revs.commits queue for reflog walking, I didn't think of
this one.  

Perhaps "!revs.commits && reflog_walk_empty(revs.reflog_info)" may
want to become a macro "walk_finished(&revs)" or something to
replace existing !revs.commits that is not accompanied by the check
on .reflog_info field?