From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] send-email: add --[no-]xmailer option Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:33:24 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20140324213814.GA1267@achilles.my.domain> <20141202193243.GA2999@charon.olymp> <20141203023419.GA10519@dcvr.yhbt.net> <20141204192245.GA3386@charon.olymp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Eric Wong , git@vger.kernel.org To: Luis Henriques X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Dec 04 20:33:37 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xwc9b-0001cY-7B for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 20:33:31 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932898AbaLDTd1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:33:27 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.int.icgroup.com ([208.72.237.35]:55594 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932315AbaLDTd0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:33:26 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD65823277; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:33:25 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=xP1hBcqAxRdoodzE5WIOc8OAJpE=; b=kZiLwJ FmhN3aHrbplH26Gh88Uj86O8U+BLpVfy+x+LrJuPnHkUSju8aTW38bF0bG/KsRwZ AY0nGrb3y+bJSnHgAZGnzJnlx+Xvyf8nyxhCNG8+rrU3tAxxIGLg9Cfugc9YST7t cI1dbo+SpSFlnLZ2SkDH08jRJO8JnQGFa/KDA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=XnFtCLbYQMyWL2rSgQ2lVnaFwbvDglbD 9l1vP/V9Shc4XhIy8rpjcMrmOr3Dd9J0kjYppfisyY5Ov0QZT3ho6zbiqasWHspY YeI1OffJ9OQcFgcWQONxNtlh6Tow6D3ufTwrhfUTAsphr59G4r3RZ/mmZAfRmMe7 53dcxfk0q+E= Received: from pb-smtp1.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49DA23275; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:33:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [72.14.226.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F8F423274; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:33:25 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20141204192245.GA3386@charon.olymp> (Luis Henriques's message of "Thu, 4 Dec 2014 19:22:45 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6A44CFCE-7BEC-11E4-97AD-42529F42C9D4-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Luis Henriques writes: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 08:56:45AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> I actually do not think this is a good idea from debuggability. > > Do you think this could be merged with yet another switch? I can't > think of a name for the switch, something like... "--hide-msgid"? In case it wasn't clear, by "this" I meant the removal of "X-Mailer:", iow, "Adding --no-xmailer option is a bad idea from debuggability's point of view". Not adding message-id is not an option; MSAs are supposed to always add one if they want to be RFC compliant, aren't they?