From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@googlemail.com>,
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] repack: accept larger window-memory and max-pack-size
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:37:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqd2jiv92q.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140123012656.GC17254@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 22 Jan 2014 20:26:56 -0500")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 08:06:42PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
>
>> But I think there is a subtle problem. Here (and elsewhere) we use the
>> parsed value of "0" as a sentinel. I think that is OK for
>> --max-pack-size, where "0" is not a reasonable value. But git-repack(1)
>> says:
>>
>> --window-memory=0 makes memory usage unlimited, which is the default.
>>
>> What does:
>>
>> git config pack.windowMemory 256m
>> git repack --window-memory=0
>>
>> do? It should override the config, but I think it does not with your
>> patch (nor with the current code). Using a string would fix that (though
>> you could also fix it by using a different sentinel, like ULONG_MAX).
>
> Here is a series that does that (and fixes the other issue I found). It
> would probably be nice to test these things, but checking that they
> actually had an impact is tricky (how do you know that --window-memory
> did the right thing?).
>
> [1/3]: repack: fix typo in max-pack-size option
> [2/3]: repack: make parsed string options const-correct
> [3/3]: repack: propagate pack-objects options as strings
>
> -Peff
Sounds sensible; will chuck the hum-ulong series and replace with
these patches.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-23 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-21 22:48 git repack --max-pack-size broken in git-next Siddharth Agarwal
2014-01-21 23:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-21 23:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-22 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix "repack --window-memory=4g" regression in 1.8.4 Junio C Hamano
2014-01-22 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] parse-options: refactor human-friendly-integer parser out of pack-objects Junio C Hamano
2014-01-22 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] repack: accept larger window-memory and max-pack-size Junio C Hamano
2014-01-23 1:06 ` Jeff King
2014-01-23 1:26 ` Jeff King
2014-01-23 1:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] repack: fix typo in max-pack-size option Jeff King
2014-01-23 1:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] repack: make parsed string options const-correct Jeff King
2014-01-23 1:30 ` [PATCH 3/3] repack: propagate pack-objects options as strings Jeff King
2014-01-23 1:38 ` Jeff King
2014-01-23 18:37 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2014-01-22 22:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix "repack --window-memory=4g" regression in 1.8.4 Stefan Beller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqd2jiv92q.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=sid0@fb.com \
--cc=stefanbeller@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.