From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Okhuomon Ajayi <okhuomonajayi54@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, christian.couder@gmail.com,
usmanakinyemi202@gmail.com, siddharthasthana31@gmail.com,
kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Outreachy PATCH v2] credential-store: add lockTimeout config option
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 13:10:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqeccphi2p.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016212216.58000-1-okhuomonajayi54@gmail.com> (Okhuomon Ajayi's message of "Fri, 16 Oct 2026 22:22:16 +0100")
Okhuomon Ajayi <okhuomonajayi54@gmail.com> writes:
> Support credentialStore.lockTimeout as the preferred setting
> for credential lock retries, retaining lockTimeoutMS as a
> deprecated alias.
>
> Signed-off-by: Okhuomon Ajayi <okhuomonajayi54@gmail.com>
Hmph, does this change even make sense?
Sure, there are many variables whose name ends with "timeout". But
are they all measured in milliseconds? Or are some measured in
seconds and others measured in milliseconds? If the latter, this
moves us in the wrong direction, no? If the time unit is not
uniform across variables, it would be more sensible to give them
names with unit so the users would immediately know when they see
cs.locktimeoutMilliSeconds = 500
that the wait will be subseconds.
On the other hand, if we are committed that all timeouts are
measured in milliseconds, such a unit suffix does not buy us much,
and better be dropped.
Anybody who reads your proposed log message above in the future will
ask these questions, and a log message that forces them to ask such
questions needs more work. State why this patch decides to do this,
and do not say "somebody told me to make this change". Your readers
want to hear why you think this change makes sense, and be
convinced.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 8:31 [PATCH] rerere: keep a background gc from killing a rebase Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget
2026-09-02 13:27 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-02 15:07 ` Thomas Bachem
2026-09-03 13:50 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-03 7:40 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-09-03 8:11 ` Thomas Bachem
2026-09-03 8:32 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-09-03 12:12 ` Thomas Bachem
2026-09-03 13:50 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-04 7:44 ` [PATCH v2] " Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget
2026-09-04 15:21 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-04 15:55 ` Thomas Bachem
2026-09-07 10:07 ` Phillip Wood
2026-09-04 17:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-04 18:17 ` Thomas Bachem
2026-09-04 15:51 ` [PATCH v3] " Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget
2026-09-04 19:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-05 5:41 ` Thomas Bachem
2026-09-05 16:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-06 10:29 ` Thomas Bachem
2026-09-07 7:41 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-09-14 8:04 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] rerere: wait for MERGE_RR.lock, and go on at a conflict Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget
2026-09-14 8:04 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] rerere: wait for MERGE_RR.lock, and let the gc skip it Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget
2026-09-28 8:18 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-09-14 8:04 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] rerere: go on at a conflict when the lock stays busy Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget
2026-09-28 8:18 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-09-28 11:58 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] rerere: wait for MERGE_RR.lock, and go on at a conflict Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget
2026-09-28 11:58 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] rerere: wait for MERGE_RR.lock before giving up Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget
2026-09-28 11:58 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] rerere: add "gc --auto" that skips a held lock Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget
2026-09-30 15:00 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-01 8:08 ` Thomas Bachem
2026-10-01 11:19 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-09-28 11:58 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] rerere: go on at a conflict when the lock stays busy Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget
2026-10-02 11:11 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] rerere: wait for MERGE_RR.lock, and go on at a conflict Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget
2026-10-02 11:11 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] rerere: wait for MERGE_RR.lock before giving up Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget
2026-10-02 11:11 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] rerere: add "gc --skip-locked" for auto maintenance Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget
2026-10-09 9:06 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-10 9:09 ` Thomas Bachem
2026-10-02 11:11 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] rerere: go on at a conflict when the lock stays busy Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget
2026-10-09 9:06 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-10 9:09 ` Thomas Bachem
2026-10-10 10:13 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] rerere: wait for MERGE_RR.lock, but not in auto maintenance Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget
2026-10-10 10:13 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] rerere: wait for MERGE_RR.lock before giving up Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget
2026-10-11 0:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-11 14:18 ` Thomas Bachem
2026-10-12 0:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-14 15:55 ` Okhuomon Ajayi
2026-10-14 23:27 ` [Outreachy PATCH] credential-store: add lockTimeout config option Okhuomon Ajayi
2026-10-15 17:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-16 21:09 ` Okhuomon Ajayi
2026-10-16 21:22 ` [Outreachy PATCH v2] " Okhuomon Ajayi
2026-10-20 22:11 ` Okhuomon Ajayi
2026-11-12 19:30 ` Okhuomon Ajayi
2026-11-12 21:10 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-10-10 10:13 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] rerere: add "gc --skip-locked" for auto maintenance Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget
2026-10-13 7:31 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-13 12:07 ` [PATCH v8 0/2] rerere: wait for MERGE_RR.lock, but not in " Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget
2026-10-13 12:07 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] rerere: wait for MERGE_RR.lock before giving up Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget
2026-10-13 12:07 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] rerere: add "gc --skip-locked" for auto maintenance Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget
2026-10-13 12:22 ` [PATCH v8 0/2] rerere: wait for MERGE_RR.lock, but not in " Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-13 16:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-14 5:36 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-14 10:43 ` Thomas Bachem
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqeccphi2p.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com \
--cc=okhuomonajayi54@gmail.com \
--cc=siddharthasthana31@gmail.com \
--cc=usmanakinyemi202@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.