From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82700C433E0 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 05:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8E064FC3 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 05:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229607AbhCKF2e (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:28:34 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:60045 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229480AbhCKF2U (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:28:20 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59D8AF990; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:28:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=0SPMOkdTFlUp2bjUKirQ5LVY+8M=; b=RxPZ0e 5C1FIkwhleErVBsjElkAa6eTpSsI1uxgs7HXj1nVjfMsLh03+OjmhI+asPQtpoRO Xd0BPh80rstbVGdrXKKiE5DmZ93A5k93cnCRoY7b/3YTNnHr6ZYT6gd+aEepSPrJ YjYnptm7PDCOxFIPThwC87qYdHhQSjtWfdgzA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=bpZG8/AkY1Fj/oOmqb8RaMnQbH40yAI9 XCg79wqBts9KJVix3sHNWMhLjJcVqPJnkToMC+Xlh7f0j8Edcfan1hh1JIvYZeGo 4ULulqYU+A1H5kA5u0HUyl9Mh8rp/54cwV8qEbsIIo/jn+vqrB5VgUVm9mi+bFUJ dYg2YPim+3s= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE4BAF98F; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:28:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C3B8AF98C; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:28:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: ZheNing Hu Cc: Git List Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2021, #03; Wed, 10) References: Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 21:28:18 -0800 In-Reply-To: (ZheNing Hu's message of "Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:20:33 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 96A6349A-822A-11EB-8254-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org ZheNing Hu writes: [ many many lines that you did not have to quote omitted; please be more considerate and save reader's time next time ] >> * zh/format-patch-fractional-reroll-count (2021-03-01) 1 commit >> - format-patch: allow a non-integral version numbers >> > I noticed that you used the'previous-count' version of > "zh/format-patch-fractional-reroll-count" in seen. > Do you want me to deal with this version instead of the > previous version that Denton Liu and Eric Sunshine helped > me complete?What > > If you want me to deal with the `previous-count` version, > I will roll it back again and deal with some small details: > use "strtol_i". I do not have any preference. I didn't even read the newer iteration as we are in pre-release freeze and I've been busy dealing with issues necessary to resolve before the upcoming release.