From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, benpeart@microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sub-process: refactor handshake to common function
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 11:14:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqeft3rrpy.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EB54F0E5-E555-40BF-8AA7-7CB3174FE22C@gmail.com> (Lars Schneider's message of "Wed, 26 Jul 2017 18:52:29 +0200")
Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com> writes:
> Please note that I've recently refactored the capabilities negotiation a bit:
> https://github.com/git/git/commit/1514c8edd62d96006cd1de31e906ed5798dd4681
>
> This change is still cooking in `next`. I am not sure how this should/could
> be handled but maybe you can use my refactoring as your base?
I think they can play well together as independent topics. The
known_caps[] thing you introduced essentially is the same as the
struct subprocess_capability capablities[] Jonathan has.
Please check
$ git show "pu^{/jt/subprocess-handshake' into pu}" convert.c
to see if it makes sense.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-26 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-24 21:38 [PATCH] sub-process: refactor handshake to common function Jonathan Tan
2017-07-24 22:21 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-07-25 14:38 ` Ben Peart
2017-07-25 17:53 ` Jonathan Tan
2017-07-25 18:29 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Jonathan Tan
2017-07-25 18:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation: migrate sub-process docs to header Jonathan Tan
2017-07-25 20:18 ` Brandon Williams
2017-07-25 18:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sub-process: refactor handshake to common function Jonathan Tan
2017-07-25 20:28 ` Brandon Williams
2017-07-25 22:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-07-26 16:52 ` [PATCH] " Lars Schneider
2017-07-26 18:14 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-07-26 18:17 ` [PATCH for NEXT v3 0/2] " Jonathan Tan
2017-07-26 18:17 ` [PATCH for NEXT v3 1/2] Documentation: migrate sub-process docs to header Jonathan Tan
2017-07-26 18:17 ` [PATCH for NEXT v3 2/2] sub-process: refactor handshake to common function Jonathan Tan
2017-08-06 19:58 ` Lars Schneider
2017-08-07 17:21 ` Jonathan Tan
2017-08-07 17:51 ` Lars Schneider
2017-08-07 18:17 ` Jonathan Tan
2017-08-07 18:29 ` Ben Peart
2017-07-26 19:48 ` [PATCH for NEXT v3 0/2] " Junio C Hamano
2017-07-29 16:26 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqeft3rrpy.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=benpeart@microsoft.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
--cc=larsxschneider@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.