From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, ps@pks.im, christian.couder@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] rev-list: introduce NUL-delimited output mode
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 14:08:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqfrjk61bb.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq34fk7hb7.fsf@gitster.g> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:37:48 -0700")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> As this topic is designing essentially a new and machine parseable
> format, we could even unify all three formats into one. For example,
> the format could be like this:
>
> <oid> NUL [<attr>=<value> NUL]...
>
> where
(0) "rev-list" that gives only a sequence of "<oid>" for commit-ish,
as well as "rev-list --boundary", would fall out as a natural
consequence. Bog-standard "list of commits" would see a
sequence of "<oid> NUL", while a boundary object would see
"<oid> NUL boundary=yes NUL".
> (1) A record ends when a new record begins.
>
> (2) The beginning of a new record is signaled by <oid> that is all
> hexadecimal and does not have any '=' in it.
>
> (3) The traditional "rev-list --objects" output that gives path in
> addition to the object name uses "path" as the <attr> name,
> i.e. such a record looks like "<oid> NUL path=<path> NUL".
>
> (4) The traditional "rev-list --missing" output loses the leading
> "?"; it is replaced by "missing" as the <attr> name, i.e. such
> a record may look like "<oid> NUL missing=yes NUL..." together
> with other "<token>=<value> NUL" pairs appended as needed at
> the end.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-10 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-10 19:28 [PATCH 0/4] rev-list: introduce NUL-delimited output mode Justin Tobler
2025-03-10 19:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] rev-list: inline `show_object_with_name()` in `show_object()` Justin Tobler
2025-03-10 20:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-10 19:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] rev-list: refactor early option parsing Justin Tobler
2025-03-10 20:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-12 21:39 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-10 19:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] rev-list: support delimiting objects with NUL bytes Justin Tobler
2025-03-10 20:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-12 21:39 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-12 7:50 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-03-12 21:41 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-10 19:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] rev-list: support NUL-delimited --missing option Justin Tobler
2025-03-10 20:37 ` [PATCH 0/4] rev-list: introduce NUL-delimited output mode Junio C Hamano
2025-03-10 21:08 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-03-11 23:24 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-11 23:19 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-11 23:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-12 7:37 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-03-12 21:45 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-10 22:38 ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-03-11 22:59 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-11 23:57 ` Jeff King
2025-03-12 7:42 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-03-12 15:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-13 7:46 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-03-12 22:09 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 5:33 ` Jeff King
2025-03-13 16:41 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-14 2:49 ` Jeff King
2025-03-14 17:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-14 18:59 ` Jeff King
2025-03-14 19:53 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-14 21:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-19 15:58 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 0:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] " Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 0:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] rev-list: inline `show_object_with_name()` in `show_object()` Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 0:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] rev-list: refactor early option parsing Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 0:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] revision: support NUL-delimited --stdin mode Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 0:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] rev-list: support delimiting objects with NUL bytes Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 12:55 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-03-13 14:44 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 0:17 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] rev-list: support NUL-delimited --boundary option Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 0:17 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] rev-list: support NUL-delimited --missing option Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 12:55 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-03-13 14:51 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 23:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] rev-list: introduce NUL-delimited output mode Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 23:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] rev-list: inline `show_object_with_name()` in `show_object()` Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 23:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] rev-list: refactor early option parsing Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 23:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] revision: support NUL-delimited --stdin mode Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 23:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] rev-list: support delimiting objects with NUL bytes Justin Tobler
2025-03-19 12:35 ` Christian Couder
2025-03-19 16:02 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 23:57 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] rev-list: support NUL-delimited --boundary option Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 23:57 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] rev-list: support NUL-delimited --missing option Justin Tobler
2025-03-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] rev-list: introduce NUL-delimited output mode Justin Tobler
2025-03-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] rev-list: inline `show_object_with_name()` in `show_object()` Justin Tobler
2025-03-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] rev-list: refactor early option parsing Justin Tobler
2025-03-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] rev-list: support delimiting objects with NUL bytes Justin Tobler
2025-03-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] rev-list: support NUL-delimited --boundary option Justin Tobler
2025-03-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] rev-list: support NUL-delimited --missing option Justin Tobler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqfrjk61bb.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jltobler@gmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.