From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2514B1E498 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 16:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707323667; cv=none; b=Rj0BFWtgNulRdNgHBEA87z8Fh9bkWQ+QoOSnv09T6DWhjhAd/mumLSmL+1Ue97BI3gZy+bWohn+S0IKGYVvH0K5oa2CZo/Gaq5ZCTTsmjEDUQ+rQvo4XUMOst3FoApexF5Ssq9qlK74rgwX82/fVkywz+PESwz/iwZZHjNWPxGo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707323667; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fOtOIdMXxv3Bw0+Xl+/vrGyue8D2yj7Z5d9ngk5zDp4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fiejr9mIS1RU7PXQUgyRS7Dc8ILhsdomfqfzsy9rEGyMKqwr/DIltHaKVTzKqGwcM8hUC1t8OtBwpDNB+RO5p7KVRJSbZBLf+/uZNyUklT47Hb+9LuO8S5vtpxMvWVS8lFburCZ06wi0g2QHmopFjcom0b22xqIwIJWi+MbYJi4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=vu1Z7Y33; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="vu1Z7Y33" Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A34091D7213; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:34:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=fOtOIdMXxv3Bw0+Xl+/vrGyue8D2yj7Z5d9ngk 5zDp4=; b=vu1Z7Y33qzhSYKecfI9JVMechtiPHJL4uL6boKPcido/Sm/tSO24mn Fx04HSIeWthH/r4aTmpERTTo+/BwdG8b/OjwCFcWu4npk1vLtnIqdJHjQiEkUlHk fPRRUpmR5zG7QPd3EtPCmGGA1WU/u4zSKhOWHoPBHvJsBldfKS7ds= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6D21D7212; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:34:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.165.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0696A1D7210; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:34:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Linus Arver Cc: Christian Couder , git@vger.kernel.org, Patrick Steinhardt , John Cai , Christian Couder , Elijah Newren , Jeff Hostetler Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] rev-list: add --allow-missing-tips to be used with --missing=... In-Reply-To: (Linus Arver's message of "Wed, 07 Feb 2024 01:57:28 -0800") References: <20240201115809.1177064-1-christian.couder@gmail.com> <20240201115809.1177064-4-christian.couder@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 08:34:22 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C0A09568-C5D6-11EE-8E02-25B3960A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Linus Arver writes: > IOW, make the minority (certainly not majority, I think?) of users who > really need the error propagation use the (new) extra flag, while the > rest of us (including the version of you who was surprised by the > limited behavior of "--missing=...", enough to write this series) don't > have to. I am skeptical that we even want that. Those who want to use the "--missing" and care about special casing missing starting points can easily check with things like "cat-file -e" before even running the "rev-list --missing".