Re: RFC: Using '--no-output-indicator-old' to only show new state

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:

> So "--new/old"? "--pre/post"?
>
> Or it could be something random, and tie it with the existing "-U"
> option, where "-U+" would be "positive side only", and "-U5-" would be
> "5 context lines, negative side only". Very dense and convenient,
> maybe not all that intuitive?

I often use -W and the above would give us a natural extension, but
I agree that is a bit too dense and totally unintuitive.  As we use
parse-options for patch output formatting options, my pick would be
"--new-only" vs "--old-only" (if there were existing options that
has new/old in their names, "--preimage-only" and "--postimage-only"
would also work, but that's much longer), and let the option parser
accept unique abbreviations like "--new" and "--old".