From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E32202DD for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 05:54:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751195AbdJBFyf (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2017 01:54:35 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:61003 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751104AbdJBFye (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2017 01:54:34 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B81394F89; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 01:54:33 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=4JjtR/bsCG1YsxkJWHsUswB01lk=; b=g4siA9 SMFlmaZcjQffBmxIGg8EFY2Ysv+kVlQY8wiu5DsH8ewwmpXBbWbxjAeCQPeZU66Z i1FbdZQlLBSIf9gSPOAcUpT6iadX7jYnSDgrl11sx5p39DRNR9kUQlB0av7AsA8R EvOFcv5NafBAoo777Lyhg5WgCSUJHuzuQ4+0M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Km6pos0lqnpF9T5Rwh7PfBM6uR2uAmMm eISD3kXKTx3RGH3zKeNJOkjNl1flMel0wbspgGqXUeLeLXa+PGNzN1uu+EY8REJT MWgdaiiJoS0PDlONe2PpEubLzHQhf9isqKkJ0kFY9aRagipKffoWjrtDEw7FR04E YQml936eMBU= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6386A94F87; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 01:54:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D446694F86; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 01:54:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Michael J Gruber Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Beller , Martin =?utf-8?Q?=C3=85gren?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] pre-merge hook References: Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 14:54:31 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Michael J. Gruber's message of "Fri, 22 Sep 2017 14:04:11 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 29C35F2E-A736-11E7-B68B-8EF31968708C-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Michael J Gruber writes: > Now that f8b863598c ("builtin/merge: honor commit-msg hook for merges", > 2017-09-07) has landed, merge is getting closer to behaving like commit, > which is important because both are used to complete merges (automatic > vs. non-automatic). Just a gentle ping to the thread to see if it is still alive. I think people agree that this is a good thing to do, but it seems that the execution leaves a few loose ends, judging from the review comments that have yet to be answered. Thanks.