Re: Should rerere auto-update a merge resolution?

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>>  - when I tell it to forget, won't it forget the pre-resolution state?
>>
>> I do not recall the details of what I did ;-) so I played around a
>> bit.  Here is what I did:
>> ...
>> After git rerere forget, I observe (check subdirectories in
>> .git/rr-cache/ whose timestamps are recent) that postimage gets
>> removed but preimage and thisimage stay.
>
> Having said that, I suspect that it may be a bug if this procedure
> kept the original preimage.  It should either remove it, or update
> it to record the state before the ealier resolution was applied
> (i.e. make the updated preimage identical to thisimage, so that a
> corrected resolution can be taken from the working tree to pair with
> it).

I just made a cursory scan of rerere.c again, and it seems we are
doing the right thing.  The details are in rerere_forget_one_path()
where we unlink postimage, we recreate the conflicted state from the
stages in the index and update preimage.

It seems that code gives up if you already declared that you'd take
the previous resolution by adding the result to the index.  It may
probably be a good idea to unmerge such a merged index entry instead
of giving up.  #leftoverbits

So, yes, it will forget both preimage and postimage, and it should
update the preimage with the conflict you got during _this_ merge,
so that the resolution you make _this_ time will become usable as
the corresponding postimage for the next time.