From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Brian Malehorn <bmalehorn@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] interpret-trailers: obey scissors lines
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 11:12:03 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqfug6yiks.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170514035652.rn5npxxflku6s5k4@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Sat, 13 May 2017 23:56:53 -0400")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>> If a commit message is being editted as "verbose", it will contain a
>> scissors string ("-- >8 --") and a diff:
>>
>> my subject
>>
>> # ------------------------ >8 ------------------------
>> # Do not touch the line above.
>> # Everything below will be removed.
>> diff --git a/foo.txt b/foo.txt
>> index 5716ca5..7601807 100644
>> --- a/foo.txt
>> +++ b/foo.txt
>> @@ -1 +1 @@
>> -bar
>> +baz
>>
>> interpret-trailers doesn't interpret the scissors and therefore places
>> trailer information after the diff. A simple reproduction is:
>>
>> git config commit.verbose true
>> GIT_EDITOR='git interpret-trailers --in-place --trailer Acked-by:me' \
>> git commit --amend
So, "git commit --amend --verbose" prepares something like the above
example and passes it to the GIT_EDITOR. The problem description
indicates that because interpret-trailers (which happens to be used
as the GIT_EDITOR) treats the cut-line used by "git commit" just
like any other random line, it tries to find the trailer block way
below, in the patch text. I agree that it is a problem. But...
>> diff --git a/builtin/commit.c b/builtin/commit.c
>> index 2de5f6cc6..2ce9c339d 100644
>> --- a/builtin/commit.c
>> +++ b/builtin/commit.c
>> @@ -1735,7 +1735,8 @@ int cmd_commit(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>>
>> if (verbose || /* Truncate the message just before the diff, if any. */
>> cleanup_mode == CLEANUP_SCISSORS)
>> - wt_status_truncate_message_at_cut_line(&sb);
>> + strbuf_setlen(&sb,
>> + wt_status_last_nonscissors_index(sb.buf, sb.len));
>
> This hunk surprised me at first (that we would need to touch commit.c at
> all), but the refactoring makes sense.
This still surprises me. If the problem is in interpret-trailers,
why do we even need to touch cmd_commit()? If GIT_EDITOR returns us
my subject
Acked-by: me
# ------------------------ >8 ------------------------
# Do not touch the line above.
# Everything below will be removed.
diff --git a/foo.txt b/foo.txt
index 5716ca5..7601807 100644
--- a/foo.txt
+++ b/foo.txt
@@ -1 +1 @@
-bar
+baz
after this patch fixes interpret-trailers, wouldn't the cmd_commit()
function work as expected without any change?
Puzzled.
The proposed log message calls the cut-line "scissors", but that is
probably a source of this confusion. The cut-line and scissors do
not have much in commmon. For one thing, scissors is a mechanism to
discard everything _ABOVE_ it. The cut-line we see in this example,
on the other hand, is about discarding everything _BELOW_ it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-15 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-12 5:03 [PATCH 0/3] interpret-trailers + commit -v bugfix Brian Malehorn
2017-05-12 5:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] mailinfo.c: is_scissors_line ends on newline Brian Malehorn
2017-05-12 8:31 ` Jeff King
2017-05-12 5:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] commit.c: add is_scissors_line Brian Malehorn
2017-05-12 8:40 ` Jeff King
2017-05-12 5:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] commit.c: skip scissors when computing trailers Brian Malehorn
2017-05-12 8:52 ` Jeff King
2017-05-12 9:00 ` [PATCH 0/3] interpret-trailers + commit -v bugfix Jeff King
2017-05-14 3:39 ` Brian Malehorn
2017-05-14 3:39 ` [PATCH] interpret-trailers: obey scissors lines Brian Malehorn
2017-05-14 3:56 ` Jeff King
2017-05-14 8:33 ` Brian Malehorn
2017-05-14 8:33 ` Brian Malehorn
2017-05-15 3:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-05-15 4:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-05-16 6:06 ` Brian Malehorn
2017-05-16 6:06 ` [PATCH] interpret-trailers: honor the cut line Brian Malehorn
2017-05-16 6:42 ` [PATCH] interpret-trailers: obey scissors lines Junio C Hamano
2017-05-15 3:08 ` Jeff King
2017-05-15 2:12 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-05-15 3:07 ` Jeff King
2017-05-15 3:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-05-15 3:33 ` Jeff King
2017-05-14 7:02 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqfug6yiks.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=bmalehorn@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.