From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Cc: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
David Turner <dturner@twitter.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] cache-tree: Write updated cache-tree after commit
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 11:32:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqfvibaegr.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACsJy8C20oFdATHKTLK=9U3_kHu1QsuS4i74RPgQn0aTwVCC8w@mail.gmail.com> (Duy Nguyen's message of "Tue, 8 Jul 2014 17:32:20 +0700")
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
> ... I know the
> "index_file" in prepare_to_commit() is probably "index.lock" or
> something, but that does not stop us from locking again
> ("index.lock.lock") if we want to update it.
We grabbed the lock on the real index and we have written out the
result of "update-index --refresh" to it (and closed), but we still
want to and do keep the lock while "add -i" works on it. And then
after "add -i" returns, we still have the lock on the real index and
the patch wants to write to it again to store the refreshed cache-tree
under that lock.
It may be the case that the API suite currently lacks a way to allow
the caller to reopen the same "index.lock" file after calling
write-locked-index(CLOSE_LOCK), and taking a lock on "index.lock" to
write into "index.lock.lock" and renaming it to "index.lock" could
be a workaround for it, but doesn't that sound a wrong workaround?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-08 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-06 4:06 [PATCH v4 1/4] cache-tree: Create/update cache-tree on checkout David Turner
2014-07-06 4:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] test-dump-cache-tree: invalid trees are not errors David Turner
2014-07-07 19:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-07-06 4:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] cache-tree: subdirectory tests David Turner
2014-07-06 8:10 ` Eric Sunshine
2014-07-07 19:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-07-06 4:06 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] cache-tree: Write updated cache-tree after commit David Turner
2014-07-07 20:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-07-08 0:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-07-08 10:32 ` Duy Nguyen
2014-07-08 17:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-07-09 1:58 ` Duy Nguyen
2014-07-08 18:32 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2014-07-08 19:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-07-07 18:58 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] cache-tree: Create/update cache-tree on checkout Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqfvibaegr.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=dturner@twitter.com \
--cc=dturner@twopensource.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.