All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Karsten Blees <karsten.blees@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2013, #03; Wed, 16)
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 12:09:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqfvrywg4y.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <526083E7.6080701@gmail.com> (Karsten Blees's message of "Fri, 18 Oct 2013 02:42:15 +0200")

Karsten Blees <karsten.blees@gmail.com> writes:

> The coredumps are caused by my patch #10, which free()s
> cache_entries when they are removed, in combination with ...

Looking at that patch, it makes me wonder if remove_index_entry_at()
and replace_index_entry() should be the ones that frees the old
entry in the first place.  A caller may already have a ce pointing
at an old entry and use the information from old_ce to update a new
one after it installed it, e.g.

	old_ce = ...
        new_ce = make_cache_entry(... old_ce->name, ...);
        replace_index_entry(... new_ce);
	new_ce->ce_mode = old_ce->cd_mode;
	free(old_ce);

The same goes for the functions that remove the entry.

But I am probably biased saying this, because in the old days, cache
entries could never be freed (they were carved out of a contiguous
region of memory, mmapped from the index file).  These days, we
parse and run ntoh*() on the on-disk cache entries to create in-core
form, and the "cache entries should never be freed" is no longer
true, but I would not be surprised if there are still some code
leftover that relies on "use after free" being safe, leaking unused
cache entries.

Going forward, I do agree with your patch #10 that removal or
replacing that may make an existing entry unreferenced should free
entries that are no longer used, and "use after free" should be
forbidden.

> Can't we just use add_file_to_cache here (which replaces
> cache_entries by creating a copy)?
>
> diff --git a/submodule.c b/submodule.c
> index 1905d75..e388487 100644
> --- a/submodule.c
> +++ b/submodule.c
> @@ -116,30 +116,7 @@ int remove_path_from_gitmodules(const char *path)
>  
>  void stage_updated_gitmodules(void)
>  {
> -       struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> -       struct stat st;
> -       int pos;
> -       struct cache_entry *ce;
> -       int namelen = strlen(".gitmodules");
> -
> -       pos = cache_name_pos(".gitmodules", namelen);
> -       if (pos < 0) {
> -               warning(_("could not find .gitmodules in index"));
> -               return;
> -       }

I think the remainder is (morally) equivalent between the original
and a single "add-file-to-cache" call, and the version after your
"how about this" patch in the message I am responding to looks more
correct (e.g. why does the original lstat after it has read the
file?).

But this warning may want to stay, no?

> -       ce = active_cache[pos];
> -       ce->ce_flags = namelen;
> -       if (strbuf_read_file(&buf, ".gitmodules", 0) < 0)
> -               die(_("reading updated .gitmodules failed"));
> -       if (lstat(".gitmodules", &st) < 0)
> -               die_errno(_("unable to stat updated .gitmodules"));
> -       fill_stat_cache_info(ce, &st);
> -       ce->ce_mode = ce_mode_from_stat(ce, st.st_mode);
> -       if (remove_cache_entry_at(pos) < 0)
> -               die(_("unable to remove .gitmodules from index"));
> -       if (write_sha1_file(buf.buf, buf.len, blob_type, ce->sha1))
> -               die(_("adding updated .gitmodules failed"));
> -       if (add_cache_entry(ce, ADD_CACHE_OK_TO_ADD|ADD_CACHE_OK_TO_REPLACE))
> +       if (add_file_to_cache(".gitmodules", 0))
>                 die(_("staging updated .gitmodules failed"));



>  }

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-18 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-16 21:43 What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2013, #03; Wed, 16) Junio C Hamano
2013-10-17  9:48 ` Karsten Blees
2013-10-17 20:40   ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-17 21:07     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-18  0:42       ` Karsten Blees
2013-10-18 19:09         ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2013-10-18 19:52           ` Jens Lehmann
2013-10-18 20:31             ` [PATCH] submodule: don't access the .gitmodules cache entry after removing it Jens Lehmann
2013-10-22 13:13           ` What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2013, #03; Wed, 16) Karsten Blees
2013-10-18 19:37         ` Jens Lehmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqfvrywg4y.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=Jens.Lehmann@web.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=karsten.blees@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.