All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "ノウラ | Flare via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "ノウラ | Flare" <nouraellm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] alloc: fix dangling pointer in alloc_state cleanup
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:47:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqh5xibqvu.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.2040.v4.git.git.1756941427825.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> ("ノ	ウラ | Flare via GitGitGadget"'s message of "Wed, 03 Sep 2025 23:17:07 +0000")

"ノウラ | Flare via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

> +void alloc_state_free_and_null(struct alloc_state **s_)
>  {
> +	struct alloc_state *s;
> +
> +	if (!s_ || !*s_) return;

I still do not see the point of this check.  If the caller passes a
NULL pointer, when they are expected to pass the address of a
pointer variable so that the struct the pointer points at is cleared
and freed, and the pointer variable is NULLed, it is called a
programmer error and they deserve a segfault.  Why would it be
better to sweep such an error under the rug by returning without
anything?  It would delay discovery of such a bug, but for what
gain?


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-04  7:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-26 19:57 [PATCH] reset slab_alloc and state fields in clear_alloc_state() ノウラ | Flare via GitGitGadget
2025-08-27  2:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-27 23:28 ` [PATCH v2] alloc: fix dangling pointer in alloc_state cleanup ノウラ | Flare via GitGitGadget
2025-08-28 19:29   ` Torsten Bögershausen
2025-08-28 19:47     ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-28 20:01       ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-29 13:00   ` [PATCH v3] " ノウラ | Flare via GitGitGadget
2025-09-03 11:18     ` Jeff King
2025-09-03 21:59       ` Junio C Hamano
2025-09-03 23:17     ` [PATCH v4] " ノウラ | Flare via GitGitGadget
2025-09-04  7:47       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-09-04 13:25         ` ノウラ | Flare
2025-09-04 16:43           ` Junio C Hamano
2025-09-04 17:44       ` [PATCH v5] " ノウラ | Flare via GitGitGadget
2025-09-04 20:25         ` Junio C Hamano
2025-09-04 20:49         ` Jeff King
2025-09-04 22:26           ` Junio C Hamano
2025-09-05  0:02             ` ノウラ | Flare
2025-09-05 13:23               ` Jeff King
2025-09-05 17:27                 ` ノウラ | Flare
2025-09-05  0:07             ` ノウラ | Flare
2025-09-05  0:25               ` ノウラ | Flare
2025-09-05  1:03                 ` ノウラ | Flare
2025-09-05 14:39                 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-09-05 17:47                   ` ノウラ | Flare
2025-09-05 13:15             ` Jeff King
2025-09-05 18:51         ` [PATCH v6] " ノウラ | Flare via GitGitGadget
2025-09-05 19:37           ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqh5xibqvu.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=nouraellm@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.