From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f177.google.com (mail-pf1-f177.google.com [209.85.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E0B12E9ED5 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 18:03:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.177 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751047398; cv=none; b=q6aaRSjvb8M5mgJrMGcMcFqFKG/sCiqFnuSM8frpsYRMxCh9bG9OqX9ZPT2r1jZJ27D6fwTABPfMVSOC+VwMAdqYjkpE/uzwt8i03/uesy7md1OjY8QICZYvU+pvuJHtzY6zD5hSzFyqCCFcwlPYv9P1lagQ2mtryzKyvq117/A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751047398; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fs4EAat2wA5B/1MoLWyB1GPIAEZc9iocL3Ww9cF1asQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=B+8musP70hwMgp3y4oDk4dBPUUPtSk8++QXCQkHwPSmEJ8aYbEtU8SpCcp2GJW97AWHZT8rMylU/uihu3MrbvOnmD2rlnI4C7R+Ll7kv87rAV9tXlI8MEYFTh9XYsoXci9rDk54yDYtlNdX5pr/HLNeVwSgZMCih7J2O6PkWGG0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=Wb/WuDAA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.177 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Wb/WuDAA" Received: by mail-pf1-f177.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-7425bd5a83aso257220b3a.0 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 11:03:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1751047395; x=1751652195; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=JUwBuq15d+16GRrLt5B4HWNTXHTwGE4wQMv1QdBys2I=; b=Wb/WuDAA7VCDT1hm30EXWRbYo156Qpa8YDKBZhdsIJSFoCORYpmqOpSDPHfl/4mfLY SAIJbhfkDWNARGHgcYkQ3M8ndAkOEhgnXV8gU7Uhn2zhr4Jt7EX/XWLfpygw50vMy6G4 pKmPLaYaBkj9AxW0aaXSXw6yGeMRfpCK+CJMnYBD+Luknbbbbf1z0tHoWpEmEjeZ8J1U qSnXLd9x1m/iHNk5vQIpG3S857pFYT6U32NJdS3Re04fOQIg/9xntthCE2olGnQym3sz q8kTfFtuB7yLpB35USig/jrEU4tRbxVEixjFRHbqrz080V7BmcBWR/CtMHAOP8waPRXo J5PA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1751047395; x=1751652195; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JUwBuq15d+16GRrLt5B4HWNTXHTwGE4wQMv1QdBys2I=; b=dLoYma6DatizIZ9Jc4bOeaPsUBft7wneIXZQ576e8ZfRA9FB4RREF5DDTO1HVqDdqr 1mytMdoaVVU+bEuT7+yIrAM3CoBJElXZQhN1SUemYT3EaDCCbsY3ahHPXYZnTa6f8tpE mMXqHmGI7QSf4oswrhgPy6bctuG05fXsOEookuE4jSuytBqiMe8YP3eoFkm7UVYPSBPB b+P4dAMxqkgwBp8fcEH6MynOFjrgkzQQqFZ2XBAKUbpnlbBXzTsnZWwFjNG/hiV/J0KN wadbCwCAP4yajWsIRZXnO9hYsqyywC/VRUJJohg7+iC2dnP1okzdJOccOGuFjKz5wdXy zXPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyY5FWwQAYCDTdY3UKyU5AdK52Iq+lAX6n9H17hp4cGmVV60+Z3 yQ/gTphTg6frrbOsH/oztHKUxRKT6P/552m0Oypjc+jT96Zgx0rGUD25dw5RjA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctK+aqumSYjQfxlsozqheqJQUsoupxETWSygYLzJWlrCPnYAeC8lGs9OVF0NtE I11cJVdqrXQwP9sgscbhCXmMCOu/TRp9fsSrYNGlPJKC2B5doQxzRUySIBCua/XY5an3rK4GSvk y/oEfJBW99ZvekcEha+HV1a4fqFqksFTx62ynGF1VAzSnwcWeXc1y6bbXRKFGjC72wLpV54ehg3 F+aodOaUOOP3d8WzJq2Ux5Ybi0OS4yZWnnhCGV2g3jz0UmrNt31/4xBx2BeIVwQrmSq9/89Hak2 cL8EGx66OB9nFouEOJx7FpDc27tk90o8sJuog8AJ1IhyyCuie3ej3mDKOord1T5qNQ9FGQjAo4U jgkVaTp/Guo7wi4dtmJxgZbegYys= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEJ3COr4c2On/6dbowOhMDt9LjJdCK5u3JCt+Z21V7Gzq/A+ifpMrgTOfGGVbeDTfS1kHEz4g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:240e:b0:234:f4da:7ecf with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-23ac2d86924mr65361925ad.8.1751047394717; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 11:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (209.255.125.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.125.255.209]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-23acb3c5a97sm21255915ad.220.2025.06.27.11.03.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 27 Jun 2025 11:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: Meet Soni Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, ps@pks.im, shejialuo@gmail.com, karthik.188@gmail.com Subject: Re: [GSoC][RFC PATCH 0/2] Add refs list subcommand In-Reply-To: <20250627074934.1761897-1-meetsoni3017@gmail.com> (Meet Soni's message of "Fri, 27 Jun 2025 13:19:32 +0530") References: <20250627074934.1761897-1-meetsoni3017@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 11:03:13 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Meet Soni writes: > - Remove legacy or obscure options that are no longer needed. Such as? > - Add improvements that wouldn't make sense to bolt onto legacy > commands. Such as? While I agree that there may be cases that the above goals in general would bring us improvements, I think neither of these two applies to for-each-ref. People are using for-each-ref to iterate over and enumerate refs already, and if you are to add some new features to "git refs list", they certainly will demand these new goodies to be added to for-each-ref as well. So, I dunno.