Re: [PATCH 2/9] doc: git-log convert rev-list-description to new doc format

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

"Jean-Noël Avila via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

> -A special notation "'<commit1>'..'<commit2>'" can be used as a
> -short-hand for "^'<commit1>' '<commit2>'". For example, either of
> +A special notation "`<commit1>..<commit2>`" can be used as a
> +short-hand for "`^<commit1> <commit2>`". For example, either of

It didn't look like there are huge differences in the rendered
output with this change (and the below hunk) ...

>  the following may be used interchangeably:
>  
>  ifdef::git-rev-list[]
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ $ git log HEAD ^origin
>  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  endif::git-log[]
>  
> -Another special notation is "'<commit1>'...'<commit2>'" which is useful
> +Another special notation is "`<commit1>...<commit2>`" which is useful

... or without, but semantically the updated one of course is more
correct ;-)