All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Cc: "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
	"Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón" <carenas@gmail.com>,
	"Eric Sunshine" <ericsunshine@charter.net>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] chainlint.pl: fix incorrect CPU count on Linux SPARC
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 12:00:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqh6ep4qoy.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cTfqk+tbTAVyPj8YP1uHx1D1swL84h-4p6OKBV=dDRX_Q@mail.gmail.com> (Eric Sunshine's message of "Wed, 22 May 2024 05:05:26 -0400")

Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:

>> > > "CPUnn:" in /proc/cpuinfo instead of the usual "processor NN:".
>> >
>> > not sure if worth a reroll, but the "usual" syntax is "processor  : NN"
> ...
> Inclusion of the word "usual" is such a minor flaw in the commit
> message that I doubt it warrants a reroll and the associated cost on
> reviewers and on the maintainer (Junio), especially since it does not
> negatively impact the intent conveyed by the commit messages nor the
> correctness of the actual patch.
>
> As such, I'm not worried about it. Whether Junio reads this and wants
> to correct it in his tree is up to him, of course.

I think "usual" is not what was pointed out. The order between the
colon and NN is.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-22 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-20 11:11 [PATCH] chainlint.pl: Extend regexp pattern for /proc/cpuinfo on Linux SPARC John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-05-20 16:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-20 16:48   ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-05-20 16:52     ` Eric Sunshine
2024-05-20 16:50   ` Eric Sunshine
2024-05-20 17:07     ` Eric Sunshine
2024-05-20 17:23     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-20 19:01 ` [PATCH 0/3] improve chainlint.pl CPU count computation Eric Sunshine
2024-05-20 19:01   ` [PATCH 1/3] chainlint.pl: make CPU count computation more robust Eric Sunshine
2024-05-20 19:01   ` [PATCH 2/3] chainlint.pl: fix incorrect CPU count on Linux SPARC Eric Sunshine
2024-05-22  8:32     ` Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón
2024-05-22  8:47       ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-05-22  9:05         ` Eric Sunshine
2024-05-22 19:00           ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-05-22 19:11             ` Eric Sunshine
2024-05-27 19:48               ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-05-27 20:12                 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-05-20 19:01   ` [PATCH 3/3] chainlint.pl: latch CPU count directly reported by /proc/cpuinfo Eric Sunshine
2024-05-20 19:17   ` [PATCH 0/3] improve chainlint.pl CPU count computation John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-05-20 19:19     ` Eric Sunshine
2024-05-20 19:23       ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-05-21 14:28         ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-05-21 16:18           ` Eric Sunshine

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqh6ep4qoy.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=carenas@gmail.com \
    --cc=ericsunshine@charter.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.