All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Eric DeCosta <edecosta@mathworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fsmonitor: option to allow fsmonitor to run against network-mounted repos
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 12:33:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqh72iefsn.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.1317.v3.git.1660242752495.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget's message of "Thu, 11 Aug 2022 18:32:32 +0000")

"Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

> From: Eric DeCosta <edecosta@mathworks.com>
>
> Though perhaps not common, there are uses cases where users have large,
> network-mounted repos. Having the ability to run fsmonitor against
> network paths would benefit those users.
>
> Most modern Samba-based filers have the necessary support to enable
> fsmonitor on network-mounted repos. As a first step towards enabling
> fsmonitor to work against network-mounted repos, introduce a
> configuration option, 'fsmonitor.allowRemote'. Setting this option to
> true will override the default behavior (erroring-out) when a
> network-mounted repo is detected by fsmonitor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric DeCosta <edecosta@mathworks.com>
> ---
> ...
>  compat/fsmonitor/fsm-settings-win32.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/compat/fsmonitor/fsm-settings-win32.c b/compat/fsmonitor/fsm-settings-win32.c
> index 907655720bb..32c0695c6c1 100644
> --- a/compat/fsmonitor/fsm-settings-win32.c
> +++ b/compat/fsmonitor/fsm-settings-win32.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,60 @@ static enum fsmonitor_reason check_vfs4git(struct repository *r)
>  	return FSMONITOR_REASON_OK;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Check if monitoring remote working directories is allowed.
> + *
> + * By default, monitoring remote working directories is
> + * disabled unless on a network filesystem that is known to
> + * behave well.  Users may override this behavior in enviroments where
> + * they have proper support.
> + */

After applying this patch, "unless on a network filesystem ..." part
is not exactly in effect yet; we could say that we start with no
known-to-behave-well network filesystems, but we can then update the
above comment when we start to know of at least one good one.

> +/*
> + * Check remote working directory protocol.
> + *
> + * Error if client machine cannot get remote protocol information.
> + */

Good, but void means that the caller of this function does not know
when we detected an error.  Perhaps return -1 on error, return 0 on
"not error", so that we can return 1 when we learn to recognize
"known to behave well" network filesystem to tell the caller?

That is,

> +static void check_remote_protocol(wchar_t *wpath)

"void" -> "int"

> +{
> +	HANDLE h;
> +	FILE_REMOTE_PROTOCOL_INFO proto_info;
> +
> +	h = CreateFileW(wpath, GENERIC_READ, FILE_SHARE_READ, NULL, OPEN_EXISTING,
> +			FILE_FLAG_BACKUP_SEMANTICS, NULL);
> +
> +	if (h == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) {
> +		error(_("[GLE %ld] unable to open for read '%ls'"),
> +		      GetLastError(), wpath);
> +		return;

"return" -> "return -1"

> +	}
> +
> +	if (!GetFileInformationByHandleEx(h, FileRemoteProtocolInfo,
> +		&proto_info, sizeof(proto_info))) {
> +		error(_("[GLE %ld] unable to get protocol information for '%ls'"),
> +		      GetLastError(), wpath);
> +		CloseHandle(h);
> +		return;

"return" -> "return -1"

> +	}
> +
> +	CloseHandle(h);
> +
> +	trace_printf_key(&trace_fsmonitor,
> +				"check_remote_protocol('%ls') remote protocol %#8.8lx",
> +				wpath, proto_info.Protocol);
> +
> +	return;

"return" -> "return 0" (or "-1")

> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Remote working directories are problematic for FSMonitor.
>   *
> @@ -115,6 +169,18 @@ static enum fsmonitor_reason check_remote(struct repository *r)
>  		trace_printf_key(&trace_fsmonitor,
>  				 "check_remote('%s') true",
>  				 r->worktree);
> +
> +		check_remote_protocol(wfullpath);

And here

		ret = check_remote_protocol(wfullpath);
		if (ret < 0)
			/* definitely an error */
			return FSMONITOR_REASON_ERROR;

and then we can fall thru the non-error case below.  We'd of course
need to declare "int ret" at the beginning of the function.

> +		switch (check_config_allowremote(r)) {
> +		case 0: /* config overrides and disables */
> +			return FSMONITOR_REASON_REMOTE;
> +		case 1: /* config overrides and enables */
> +			return FSMONITOR_REASON_OK;
> +		default:
> +			break; /* config has no opinion */
> +		}
> +
>  		return FSMONITOR_REASON_REMOTE;
>  	}

In the future, when this "first step" graduates to the upcoming
release, we may want to have a follow-up enhancement patch that
changes the code like so:

 * we recognize ones like SMB in check_remote_protocol() as "known
   to be good", and return 1 from there

 * after the "switch" above determies that the configuration file
   does not have any opinion, instead of unconditionally returning
   REASON_REMOTE to refuse the request, pay attention to "ret", e.g.
   something like

-	return FSMONITOR_REASON_REMOTE;
+	if (!ret)
+		return FSMONITOR_REASON_REMOTE;
+	else /* known to be good ones */
+		return FSMONITOR_REASON_OK;

When we do so, we'd resurrect the "unless on a network filesystem
that is known to behave well" comment.  What this last part does is
exactly that.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-11 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-09 17:44 [PATCH] fsmonitor: option to allow fsmonitor to run against network-mounted repos Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget
2022-08-10 16:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-08-10 18:49   ` Eric D
2022-08-10 19:50     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-08-10 20:36       ` Eric D
2022-08-10 21:30         ` Eric D
2022-08-10 21:41           ` Junio C Hamano
2022-08-11 15:57 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Option to allow fsmonitor to run against repos on network file systems Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget
2022-08-11 15:57   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] fsmonitor: option to allow fsmonitor to run against network-mounted repos Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget
2022-08-11 15:57   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] fsmonitor.allowRemote now overrides default behavior Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget
2022-08-11 16:53     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-08-11 17:49       ` Eric D
2022-08-11 17:53         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-08-11 17:58           ` Eric D
2022-08-11 18:32   ` [PATCH v3] fsmonitor: option to allow fsmonitor to run against network-mounted repos Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget
2022-08-11 19:33     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-08-11 23:57     ` [PATCH v4] " Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget
2022-08-12 18:23       ` Junio C Hamano
2022-08-15 16:01       ` Jeff Hostetler
2022-08-15 17:33         ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqh72iefsn.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=edecosta@mathworks.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.