All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Rubén Justo" <rjusto@gmail.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] status: fix branch shown when not only bisecting
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 15:08:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqil76kyov.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e24ca9b-9c5f-f4df-b9f8-6574a714dfb2@gmail.com> ("Rubén Justo"'s message of "Sat, 9 Sep 2023 22:12:47 +0200")

Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com> writes:

> In 83c750acde (wt-status.*: better advice for git status added,
> 2012-06-05), git-status received new informative messages to describe
> the ongoing work in a worktree.
>
> These messages were enhanced in 0722c805d6 (status: show the branch name
> if possible in in-progress info, 2013-02-03), to show, if possible, the
> branch where the operation was initiated.
>
> Since then, we show incorrect information when several operations are in
> progress and one of them is bisect:
>
>    $ git checkout -b foo
>    $ GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR='echo break >' git rebase -i HEAD~
>    $ git checkout -b bar
>    $ git bisect start
>    $ git status
>    ...
>
>    You are currently editing a commit while rebasing branch 'bar' on '...'.
>
>    You are currently bisecting, started from branch 'bar'.
>
>    ...
>
> Note that we erroneously say "while rebasing branch 'bar'" when we
> should be referring to "foo".
>
> This must have gone unnoticed for so long because it must be unusual to
> start a bisection while another operation is in progress.  And even less
> usual to involve different branches.
>
> It caught my attention reviewing a leak introduced in 8b87cfd000
> (wt-status: move strbuf into read_and_strip_branch(), 2013-03-16).
>
> A simple change to deal with this situation can be to record in struct
> wt_status_state, the branch where the bisect starts separately from the
> branch related to other operations.
>
> Let's do it and so we'll be able to display correct information and
> we'll avoid the leak as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
>
> ---
>
> Let's try again.

Sigh... nobody seems to be interested in making sure this correctly
improves the system X-<.

After a quick re-read, I didn't find anything glaringly wrong, so
let's see if anybody complains after the patch gets merged to
'next'.

Thanks.

      reply	other threads:[~2023-10-16 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-30  1:07 [PATCH] status: fix branch shown when not only bisecting Rubén Justo
2023-07-31 23:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-08-01 20:39   ` Rubén Justo
2023-08-01 20:45     ` Junio C Hamano
2023-08-16  4:24       ` Junio C Hamano
2023-09-09 20:12 ` [PATCH v2] " Rubén Justo
2023-10-16 22:08   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqil76kyov.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjusto@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.