From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6609C2021E for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 23:04:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752824AbcKIXEQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2016 18:04:16 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:59949 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751420AbcKIXEP (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2016 18:04:15 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7E04D7D4; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 18:04:14 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=s513xxjCrMPvNugdGY8xsEmZANI=; b=vg+swB KWRhW9BdhGucaqAlEHS1dgWEtKu9RSe0bFtWfkamgsWF3xZut60osizy4CYFerNV Jk129AaBFzijT+9KWbVrrXIV3MLMws63XgJw01Z0XjRg+wUVKlEX9gsymUTO0xVh YDkmspfGSW5s0kQ8ztd8ew7hcgelmrFyFjhnk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=EFqkeXnl3ZwSV9PT2fc9nJ90zDt5a1sF nS+Sz2H3u5muzETTr9jprvN1m1IfFu5DXF+eS89vP8vHefBa9T4d5cggVm7uN3r8 ba1jiWRAMmGAN67rkRWYRCkSf4Ngi2OjY3Fi3J7392CcdhVirn6MSTvJkkzLFtvB XcP1nl7MQSE= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E304D7D3; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 18:04:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB12E4D7D2; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 18:04:13 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Markus Hitter Cc: "git\@vger.kernel.org" , Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] gitk: memory consumption improvements References: <8eac2a5b-071f-6d17-4d81-0744db16910d@jump-ing.de> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:04:12 -0800 In-Reply-To: <8eac2a5b-071f-6d17-4d81-0744db16910d@jump-ing.de> (Markus Hitter's message of "Wed, 9 Nov 2016 13:39:34 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D50C1464-A6D0-11E6-BF92-3AB77A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Markus Hitter writes: > Am 08.11.2016 um 22:37 schrieb Junio C Hamano: >> Are all semi-modern Tcl/Tk in service have this -undo thing so that >> we can pass unconditionally to the text widget like the patch does? > > Good point. As far as my research goes, this flag was introduced in Nov. 2001: > > http://core.tcl.tk/tk/info/5265df93d207cec0 Sounds safe enough then ;-) Thanks for an additional research.