From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] git-commit: add a commit.verbose config variable Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 08:56:48 -0800 Message-ID: References: <56CFBF19.6040004@zoho.com> <56D05295.6020102@zoho.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Eric Sunshine , Stefan Beller , Matthieu Moy , Git Mailing List , Jeff King , Johannes Schindelin , Christian Couder , Lars Schneider To: Pranit Bauva X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 26 17:56:57 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aZLhJ-0002ry-CD for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:56:57 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933286AbcBZQ4x (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:56:53 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp0.int.icgroup.com ([208.72.237.35]:53248 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754483AbcBZQ4x (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:56:53 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8880A43D49; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:56:51 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=EEaMQldPUWPmsaSIHX6dhXxh6RI=; b=eqNF18 YJ5OGs7/vxoHZcYe34q5HtVPdgPyTPTM3zTW2NcSrVGR7PMWiiI+7FzEhC5iniE9 CHnF2GM944rkAGbzZw0XJfKNxXN2V3x41HHdqrokXt9FZubHbwXPkUKbxi47xEfy g1/NBr0LU42nlDN3cKJ/YXdCJd4j2FR5kh95o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=rbb82vtAak4OY0eVnmlZBsd7Zj4o9tjh CqV5tY6hxLxi6MM0B1NYsWMn6Ua5t3/enWHjqDX7muK4HUgmQDmeT35IQDZ4DVr+ LAEWii0ouoc4VWvcEVY/zHnyeAT2sZhENnXWHj6ZIkrHljXJ1LxkUKk26ZwVZ96/ SrtCzZ819+w= Received: from pb-smtp0.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9D843D47; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:56:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.1.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D91D743D38; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:56:49 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <56D05295.6020102@zoho.com> (Pranit Bauva's message of "Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:26:45 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: EDA79C88-DCA9-11E5-B4D2-79226BB36C07-77302942!pb-smtp0.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Pranit Bauva writes: >> If you know you haven't finished, you may use WIP (work in progress) >> instead of RFC in the title. > > I wasn't familiar with this tag. I will keep it in mind. And this is not > included in Documentation/SubmittingPatches , so I will send a patch to > include WIP tag. Please don't. It is OK to say WIP or RFC or some people even say [not a patch] there; we do not need to enumerate all of them, and your original RFC was just fine.