From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: best practices against long git rebase times? Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 16:18:29 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20151204150546.GA17210@inner.h.apk.li> <20151204153103.GP18913@serenity.lan> <20151206164345.GH22288@inner.h.apk.li> <20151207210212.GF30203@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20151207225957.GB3785@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Andreas Krey , John Keeping , Git Mailing List To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Dec 08 01:18:40 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a65zL-0000ZY-Ap for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 01:18:39 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754972AbbLHASf (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2015 19:18:35 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp0.int.icgroup.com ([208.72.237.35]:62068 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754620AbbLHASe (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2015 19:18:34 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F323E320C8; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 19:18:31 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=hoj4kMmf5E08iJ+CLsTHnp2hxNY=; b=NOFHbK LSTI//tZa11n4SkjETMrbZTT8KEzj2oMo1ptUw6unorZuDN2EbYSr2rvhpJKyI5V Il8xVmHHDYd9M2EP+/xVLgyi9KMHpITG7vQsXYpgBPu2PLWP8I0Ae4h8+LPGhBno B1lg2+nHLXDiRw6FNXu2VOGqGLmpH15CYoSK8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=BKAK+iZ5enhoi+ah8GlRB5/HzylBoDZU turyXOgEi4PPmu+B3ohStgs0A+cK03svCVe7ZLrkRds5jPSOJRaPztwommEQrM1Y Z1AAxvrg7XVvPAAKeGIX7I9Bgj3d7aMU4ZJUlpCJ1DaBZOCjAFdjo7g7xGLLgxPM 4ZfzNujmtWI= Received: from pb-smtp0.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C28320C7; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 19:18:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [216.239.45.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 628B5320C6; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 19:18:31 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20151207225957.GB3785@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Mon, 7 Dec 2015 17:59:57 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 364D8C8E-9D41-11E5-B192-6BD26AB36C07-77302942!pb-smtp0.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > I think you missed John's earlier response which gave several pointers > to such caching schemes. :) Yeah, you're right. > > I used to run with patch-id-caching in my personal fork (I frequently > use "git log --cherry-mark" to see what has made it upstream), but I > haven't for a while. It did make a big difference in speed, but I never > resolved the corner cases around cache invalidation. > > -Peff