All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,  ps@pks.im
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] bulk-checkin: use repository variable from transaction
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 10:03:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqjz2vxp98.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250821232249.319427-5-jltobler@gmail.com> (Justin Tobler's message of "Thu, 21 Aug 2025 18:22:49 -0500")

Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com> writes:

> The bulk-checkin subsystem depends on `the_repository`. Adapt functions
> and call sites to access the repository through `struct odb_transaction`
> instead. The `USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIBALE` is still required as the
> `pack_compression_level` and `pack_size_limit_cfg` globals are still
> used.

Also we grab the details of the new packfile the bulk-checkin
machinery is building out of the transaction, which made some
redundant parameters functions take go away, ...

> -static void finish_tmp_packfile(struct strbuf *basename,
> -				const char *pack_tmp_name,
> -				struct pack_idx_entry **written_list,
> -				uint32_t nr_written,
> -				struct pack_idx_option *pack_idx_opts,
> +static void finish_tmp_packfile(struct odb_transaction *transaction,
> +				struct strbuf *basename,
>  				unsigned char hash[])

... like this one.  Very nice.

> @@ -117,7 +118,8 @@ static void flush_batch_fsync(struct odb_transaction *transaction)
>  	 * to ensure that the data in each new object file is durable before
>  	 * the final name is visible.
>  	 */
> -	strbuf_addf(&temp_path, "%s/bulk_fsync_XXXXXX", repo_get_object_directory(the_repository));
> +	strbuf_addf(&temp_path, "%s/bulk_fsync_XXXXXX",
> +		    transaction->odb->sources->path);

This is doing a lot more than a simple "the_repository" ->
"odb->repo" replacement.  How much confidence do we have
that the internal detail of repo_get_object_directory() will stay
the same and our developers in the future would spot that this open
coded copy needs to be updated if they have to change it?

> -static int deflate_blob_to_pack(struct bulk_checkin_packfile *state,
> -				struct object_id *result_oid,
> -				int fd, size_t size,
> -				const char *path, unsigned flags)
> +int index_blob_bulk_checkin(struct odb_transaction *transaction,
> +			    struct object_id *result_oid,
> +			    int fd, size_t size,
> +			    const char *path, unsigned flags)

Ahh, OK, with the simplification to always take transaction, there
is no need to have the deflate_blob_to_pack() function, which had
only one caller, as an internal implementation detail anymore.

This change could have been in the previous step and it would have
been less surprising; the above "Ahh, OK" is my reaction to the
surprise ;-)


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-22 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-20 22:55 [PATCH 0/3] bulk-checkin: remove global transaction state Justin Tobler
2025-08-20 22:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] bulk-checkin: introduce object database transaction structure Justin Tobler
2025-08-20 22:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] bulk-checkin: remove global transaction state Justin Tobler
2025-08-20 22:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] bulk-checkin: wire repository variable Justin Tobler
2025-08-21  0:15   ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-21 20:26     ` Justin Tobler
2025-08-21 20:32       ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-21  0:00 ` [PATCH 0/3] bulk-checkin: remove global transaction state Junio C Hamano
2025-08-21 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] " Justin Tobler
2025-08-21 23:22   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] bulk-checkin: introduce object database transaction structure Justin Tobler
2025-08-21 23:22   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] bulk-checkin: remove global transaction state Justin Tobler
2025-08-22 16:37     ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-22 18:07       ` Justin Tobler
2025-08-22 20:25         ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-21 23:22   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] bulk-checkin: require transaction for index_blob_bulk_checkin() Justin Tobler
2025-08-22 16:49     ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-22 19:13       ` Justin Tobler
2025-08-22 20:33         ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-21 23:22   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] bulk-checkin: use repository variable from transaction Justin Tobler
2025-08-22 17:03     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-08-22 19:38       ` Justin Tobler
2025-08-22 21:34   ` [PATCH v3 0/4] bulk-checkin: remove global transaction state Justin Tobler
2025-08-22 21:34     ` [PATCH v3 1/4] bulk-checkin: introduce object database transaction structure Justin Tobler
2025-08-22 21:34     ` [PATCH v3 2/4] bulk-checkin: remove global transaction state Justin Tobler
2025-08-22 21:34     ` [PATCH v3 3/4] bulk-checkin: require transaction for index_blob_bulk_checkin() Justin Tobler
2025-08-22 21:35     ` [PATCH v3 4/4] bulk-checkin: use repository variable from transaction Justin Tobler
2025-08-25 20:25     ` [PATCH v3 0/4] bulk-checkin: remove global transaction state Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqjz2vxp98.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jltobler@gmail.com \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.