From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
Cc: "'darcy via GitGitGadget'" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
<git@vger.kernel.org>, "'darcy'" <acednes@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] date: detect underflow/overflow when parsing dates with timezone offset
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 16:52:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqjzivrq93.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <114401dabc5a$08a72060$19f56120$@nexbridge.com> (rsbecker@nexbridge.com's message of "Tue, 11 Jun 2024 19:49:37 -0400")
<rsbecker@nexbridge.com> writes:
>>Also, as you can see at one of the GitHub CI jobs, e.g.,
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/9455916669/job/26046731619#step:6:1915
>>
> Does this imply that timestamp tests will fail on 32-bit systems? I am
> unsure how to interpret this. Can you please clarify?
Sorry, but I have nothing more to clarify than what appears in the
quoted CI log.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-11 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-27 9:17 [PATCH] fix: prevent date underflow when using positive timezone offset darcy via GitGitGadget
2024-05-28 14:05 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-28 14:49 ` Phillip Wood
2024-05-28 17:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-02 23:06 ` [PATCH v2] date: detect underflow when parsing dates with " darcy via GitGitGadget
2024-06-03 11:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-03 11:44 ` darcy
2024-06-03 14:13 ` Phillip Wood
2024-06-04 8:48 ` darcy
2024-06-04 9:33 ` Jeff King
2024-06-05 6:52 ` darcy
2024-06-05 13:10 ` Phillip Wood
2024-06-05 17:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-06 4:56 ` darcy
2024-06-07 0:17 ` [PATCH v3] date: detect underflow/overflow when parsing dates with " darcy via GitGitGadget
2024-06-07 17:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-08 18:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-14 1:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-15 11:47 ` Karthik Nayak
2024-06-11 23:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-11 23:49 ` rsbecker
2024-06-11 23:52 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-06-25 23:12 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Darcy's "date underflow fix" topic, final reroll Junio C Hamano
2024-06-25 23:12 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] t0006: simplify prerequisites Junio C Hamano
2024-06-25 23:30 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-06-26 0:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-25 23:12 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] date: detect underflow/overflow when parsing dates with timezone offset Junio C Hamano
2024-06-26 15:21 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Darcy's "date underflow fix" topic, final reroll Phillip Wood
2024-06-26 18:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-12 9:07 ` [PATCH v3] date: detect underflow/overflow when parsing dates with timezone offset Phillip Wood
2024-06-12 9:49 ` Karthik Nayak
2024-06-13 13:31 ` Phillip Wood
2024-06-13 16:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-14 20:09 ` Karthik Nayak
2024-06-14 21:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-15 11:49 ` Karthik Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqjzivrq93.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=acednes@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=rsbecker@nexbridge.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.