From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A4C41CD00 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.70 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711147431; cv=none; b=nzphQ5t1CqwbJoUxtqPuzJby9Pq/E/p9O74v4Te9DNyo9FEkdpLKA6Tkv3OHwude6AcfcoHgeHVWHMm/Y/Hpu4YHQkmPrYlVQyxNC915McZnR5MjGfVvMAGP12Mz5K+lWQG+6nXU+U8Sh4KpRlsGwQfBdfayIFatAN6XNEC1bI0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711147431; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TU/COGqDX4JrKhI1mwwd64ccC1c6yQo1U3/4GKgv5m4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZemRAGLSbWgIQhgNFUlXAc2XjUNUwDB7ZeM7YAVUuGh+mEvrfF9zks0QwTHdCeMnP2rk+rmMY3RScIEIi7RdJ88oR2zXledMroh27DZOxwKWOrTFLfqIh6PJ+2LyINjl8Q1/LrdfSp7ijEqrsWnvjh4wk3dSImmMFt1wwTKUg64= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=CeCcOBK+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.70 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="CeCcOBK+" Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A831CCCE9; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 18:43:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=TU/COGqDX4Jr KhI1mwwd64ccC1c6yQo1U3/4GKgv5m4=; b=CeCcOBK+SwKx32FkQhImsNhNk3sF rYnrjOmERpAN795NTX6Ds1g7dDbTTJs4knERavPZiN3K5W4sZZBq7Xb1LzyF2TPU h5R42Yfd05r/eBKHQsToSNQK0YKaIOVnPRIcHP7lF4GMCA3u2/wg/DSRNi90Z4FV bujcEeUPpNTZiRI= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A1D1CCCE6; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 18:43:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.139.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D9CE1CCCE5; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 18:43:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" Cc: "Max Gautier" , =?utf-8?B?TMOpbmHDr2M=?= Huard , "Derrick Stolee" , "Patrick Steinhardt" , "Jeff King" , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] maintenance: cleanup $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/systemd/user In-Reply-To: <5b9dc977-e8f9-472f-8476-1b13fa6e6d93@app.fastmail.com> (Kristoffer Haugsbakk's message of "Fri, 22 Mar 2024 23:38:09 +0100") References: <20240322221327.12204-1-mg@max.gautier.name> <20240322221327.12204-5-mg@max.gautier.name> <5b9dc977-e8f9-472f-8476-1b13fa6e6d93@app.fastmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 15:43:47 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A5C913D4-E89D-11EE-82FF-78DCEB2EC81B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" writes: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024, at 23:11, Max Gautier wrote: >> Notes: >> How should I refer to a commit which is part of the same patch ser= ies ? >> The commit id will change so the message won't be correct anymore,= right >> ? > > It looks like a fair few say =E2=80=9Cin the previous commit=E2=80=9D f= or the one just > before this one and =E2=80=9Cin a previous commit=E2=80=9D for some com= mit that was > before this in the series but not the immediate previous one. I guess > that=E2=80=99s okay, no? I saw some series say "Earlier in the series, X has learned to do Y, so now we take advantage of that new feature", and found it quite readable.