From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>
Cc: Han-Wen Nienhuys via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwenn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] reftable: support preset file mode for writing
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 11:14:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqk0f7z9lr.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFQ2z_MEN2j-sHmGK4SA6N8P9bHvjO2=+G0XxXp_9vzLRxwKuw@mail.gmail.com> (Han-Wen Nienhuys's message of "Mon, 10 Jan 2022 20:01:54 +0100")
Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 5:46 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> > if (add->lock_file_fd < 0) {
>> > if (errno == EEXIST) {
>> > err = REFTABLE_LOCK_ERROR;
>> > @@ -478,6 +478,13 @@ static int reftable_stack_init_addition(struct reftable_addition *add,
>> > }
>> > goto done;
>> > }
>> > + if (st->config.default_permissions) {
>> > + if (chmod(add->lock_file_name.buf, st->config.default_permissions) < 0) {
>> > + err = REFTABLE_IO_ERROR;
>> > + goto done;
>>
>> This part does not exactly make sense, though.
>
> why?
Explained in the part that follows that statement in the message you
are responding to.
> I read over the adjust_shared_perm function for a bit, but I'm puzzled
> why its complexity is necessary. It seems to do something with X-bits,
> maybe for directories, but that doesn't apply here as we're only
> handling files?
We are propagating executable bit, which affects both directories
and files.
> We also only write new files, so we never have to look at the existing
> mode of a file.
It is mostly about defeating the umask of whoever is esecuting "git".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-10 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-23 19:29 [PATCH 0/3] preliminary fixes for reftable support Han-Wen Nienhuys via GitGitGadget
2021-12-23 19:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] reftable: fix typo in header Han-Wen Nienhuys via GitGitGadget
2021-12-23 19:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] reftable: signal overflow Han-Wen Nienhuys via GitGitGadget
2021-12-23 19:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] reftable: support preset file mode for writing Han-Wen Nienhuys via GitGitGadget
2021-12-24 4:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-10 19:01 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2022-01-10 19:14 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2021-12-23 20:27 ` [PATCH 0/3] preliminary fixes for reftable support Junio C Hamano
2021-12-24 2:15 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqk0f7z9lr.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=hanwen@google.com \
--cc=hanwenn@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.