From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD85C433ED for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 19:08:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45EF6105A for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 19:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236231AbhDKTIq (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Apr 2021 15:08:46 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:64377 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235420AbhDKTIq (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Apr 2021 15:08:46 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D4ECAE7E; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 15:08:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=XhQKg1VHdaed 86Iu9V/sBxhfBA0=; b=OYLCMNLxo0X8sbj7CAghtDa/oMgKD+CQXOyyS26eBZoh j4bEAIt6tgJlVqL42GGf6yMpvH1XZcncHTVtJYGyBPXcugb238ke0DptnPxuCR/r shNvIdsxPERnFzWb0l2HSj331dyV0nMH7Bmax1aFA5PT/aWiIkwqrao2zcIroZY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=JC7nU8 PIJQ5aH53E25+TQNvQQ0ahT/t2eMovu7DDVlKevxyHwa00A0DOhVfcNfAK1YSXUr 6I6JdO5fOjOJaGLBju0khLY83j6uuW06gS6b+ktwJM7dyW8BIMKsaY44snz9403A NSNGs6l+J5SIKPxTBYW1uYeyoYhKZa7zhbn2M= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487E8CAE7D; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 15:08:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.243.138.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B73C8CAE7C; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 15:08:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Drew DeVault Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] send-email: remove non-working support for "sendemail.smtpssl" References: <20210411125431.28971-1-sir@cmpwn.com> Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 12:08:28 -0700 In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?B?IsOGdmFyCUFybmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Sun, 11 Apr 2021 16:43:19 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4C9AB078-9AF9-11EB-9AD9-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: > So let's just remove it instead of fixing the bug, clearly nobody's > cared enough to complain. Hmph, is that a safe assumption? They may have just assumed that you did not break it and kept using plaintext without knowing? If we do not give a warning when sending over an unencrypted channel in red flashing letters, that is more likely explanation than nobody caring that we saw no breakage reports, no?