All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>,
	Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Avoid file descriptor exhaustion in ref_transaction_commit()
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 12:27:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqk2x0ypmo.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150424172648.GB30592@peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 24 Apr 2015 13:26:48 -0400")

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> Stefan's patch is just in pu at this point, right? I do not think there
> is any rushing/release concern. It is too late for either to be in
> v2.4.0, so the only decision is whether to aim for "master" or "maint".
> To me, they both seem to be in the same ballpark as far as risking a
> regression.

The series builds on c1f0ca9 that is on 2.4.0-rc2, so we would need
to wiggle things around to apply to older codebase if we want to fix
the "too many open file descriptor" issue on older maintenance
releases for "update-ref --stdin".

I personally feel that it is OK to ship v2.4.0 without the fix,
leaving "push --atomic" broken, and fix it in v2.4.1, but I kinda
prefer that the final fix to be applicable for older maintenance
releases, at least to 2.3.x track, if not 2.2.x track.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-25 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-24 11:35 [PATCH 0/5] Avoid file descriptor exhaustion in ref_transaction_commit() Michael Haggerty
2015-04-24 11:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] write_ref_to_lockfile(): new function, extracted from write_ref_sha1() Michael Haggerty
2015-04-24 11:35 ` [PATCH 2/5] commit_ref_update(): " Michael Haggerty
2015-04-24 11:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] write_ref_sha1(): inline function at callers Michael Haggerty
2015-04-24 11:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] ref_transaction_commit(): remove the local flags variables Michael Haggerty
2015-04-24 17:30   ` Jeff King
2015-04-24 21:15     ` Michael Haggerty
2015-04-24 21:19       ` Jeff King
2015-04-24 21:51   ` Eric Sunshine
2015-04-24 22:22     ` Michael Haggerty
2015-04-24 11:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] ref_transaction_commit(): only keep one lockfile open at a time Michael Haggerty
2015-04-25  6:08   ` Michael Haggerty
2015-04-25  6:57     ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-25 19:21       ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-28  4:36         ` Jeff King
2015-04-24 17:26 ` [PATCH 0/5] Avoid file descriptor exhaustion in ref_transaction_commit() Jeff King
2015-04-24 19:13   ` Stefan Beller
2015-04-25 19:27   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2015-04-25  4:28 ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqk2x0ypmo.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=sbeller@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.