Re: [PATCH 05/11] Fix some typos and improve wording

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Thomas Ackermann <th.acker@arcor.de> writes:

> Signed-off-by: Thomas Ackermann <th.acker@arcor.de>
> ---
>  Documentation/user-manual.txt | 20 ++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/user-manual.txt b/Documentation/user-manual.txt
> index 6241a43..465d9cb 100644
> --- a/Documentation/user-manual.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/user-manual.txt
> @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ of development leading to that point.
>  
>  The best way to see how this works is using the linkgit:gitk[1]
>  command; running gitk now on a Git repository and looking for merge
> -commits will help understand how the Git organizes history.
> +commits will help understand how Git organizes history.
>  
>  In the following, we say that commit X is "reachable" from commit Y
>  if commit X is an ancestor of commit Y.  Equivalently, you could say
> @@ -793,7 +793,7 @@ e05db0fd4f31dde7005f075a84f96b360d05984b
>  -------------------------------------------------
>  
>  Or you could recall that the `...` operator selects all commits
> -contained reachable from either one reference or the other but not
> +reachable from either one reference or the other but not
>  both; so
>  
>  -------------------------------------------------
> @@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ You could just visually inspect the commits since e05db0fd:
>  $ gitk e05db0fd..
>  -------------------------------------------------
>  
> -Or you can use linkgit:git-name-rev[1], which will give the commit a
> +or you can use linkgit:git-name-rev[1], which will give the commit a

I think I agree with Jonathan that this reads better with "Or", not
"or".

Other than that looks good to me.  Thanks.