From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>,
Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] merge: remember conflict labels
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 08:09:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqld839cr2.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ac1a744-b326-4b61-869a-546fee80da20@gmail.com> (Phillip Wood's message of "Mon, 12 Oct 2026 15:10:32 +0100")
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Junio
>
> On 10/10/2026 01:24, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>> This function is called once for each conflicted path, which means
>> we would read the "merge.renormalize" configuration variable and the
>> MERGE_LABELS file, both of which will stay constant during a single
>> conflicted "checkout -m". The issue is shared with the original,
>> but looking up the same configuration variable repeatedly would be
>> helped with in-core configset cache. Compared to that, the overhead
>> added by this patch is to open the same unchanging file, read & parse,
>> allocate and deallocate.
>>
>> Perhaps we want to have another preliminary [PATCH 1.5/2] before
>> this step to allow setting these "per invocation constants" once to
>> be reused? Then step [PATCH 2/2] can read labels in the prepare
>> phace just once, use it from the data structure in
>> checkout_merged(), and free them in release phase when we are done.
>
> That's a good idea, I'll re-roll using the diff below (I assume you're
> happy for me to add your sign off?)
You assumed correctly, but if you ask me, I would say that it
probably does not count much as coauthorship than a mere helped-by.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 9:48 [PATCH 0/2] checkout -m: recreate conflict labels Phillip Wood
2026-09-30 9:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] remove_branch_state: convert boolean argument to flags Phillip Wood
2026-09-30 9:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] merge: remember conflict labels Phillip Wood
2026-09-30 16:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-01 8:54 ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-01 17:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-30 20:24 ` [PATCH 0/2] checkout -m: recreate " Johannes Sixt
2026-09-30 20:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-30 21:20 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-10-01 8:45 ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-05 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 " Phillip Wood
2026-10-05 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] remove_branch_state: convert boolean argument to flags Phillip Wood
2026-10-05 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] merge: remember conflict labels Phillip Wood
2026-10-05 16:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-06 15:21 ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-05 16:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-06 15:05 ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-06 15:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-07 13:38 ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-05 14:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] checkout -m: recreate " Johannes Sixt
2026-10-05 15:09 ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-05 15:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-09 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 " Phillip Wood
2026-10-09 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] remove_branch_state: convert boolean argument to flags Phillip Wood
2026-10-09 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] merge: remember conflict labels Phillip Wood
2026-10-10 0:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-12 14:10 ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-12 15:09 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-10-09 20:31 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] checkout -m: recreate " Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqld839cr2.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.