From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Zakariyah Ali via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>,
Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>,
Siddharth Asthana <siddharthasthana31@gmail.com>,
Ayush Chandekar <ayu.chandekar@gmail.com>,
Zakariyah Ali <zakariyahali100@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] [GSoC Patch] t2000: modernize path checks to use helper functions
Date: Sun, 24 May 2026 18:55:33 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqldd9i12i.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.2256.git.git.1779534462.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Zakariyah Ali via GitGitGadget's message of "Sat, 23 May 2026 11:07:40 +0000")
"Zakariyah Ali via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> This is my GSoC microproject submission modernizing test path checks in
> t/t2000-conflict-when-checking-files-out.sh.
I do not quite get where you intend to fit these two patches.
> base-commit: 60f07c4f5c5f81c8a994d9e06b31a4a3a1679864
This is fairly old, v2.54.0-rc2~9.
But the thing is, your earlier clean-up to this t2000 script
4a9e0972 (t2000: consolidate second scenario into a single test
block, 2026-04-29) was queued on za/t2000-modernise-more was merged
to 'master' at b5d94909 (Merge branch 'za/t2000-modernise-more',
2026-05-21). But what is most curious about these two patches is
that the [PATCH 1/2] starts like so:
From: Zakariyah Ali <zakariyahali100@gmail.com>
Now that the test script has been modernised, consolidate the eight
separate test_expect_success blocks ...
I take that to be a reference to your previous effort in za/t2000-modernise-more
topic. But these two patches are changing the code as if that did
not even exist.
If the za/t2000-modernise-more topic were still not merged to
'next', sending in replacement patches works just fine. but a new
patch that ignores anything that have already been merged to 'next'
or 'master' is counter-productive.
> Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-2256%2Falibaba0010%2Fmodernize-test-path-checking-v1
> Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-2256/alibaba0010/modernize-test-path-checking-v1
> Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/2256
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-24 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-23 11:07 [PATCH 0/2] [GSoC Patch] t2000: modernize path checks to use helper functions Zakariyah Ali via GitGitGadget
2026-05-23 11:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] t2000: consolidate second scenario into a single test block Zakariyah Ali via GitGitGadget
2026-05-23 11:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] t2000: cleanup unused debug code and variables Zakariyah Ali via GitGitGadget
2026-05-24 9:55 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqldd9i12i.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=ayu.chandekar@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=jltobler@gmail.com \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=siddharthasthana31@gmail.com \
--cc=zakariyahali100@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.