Re: [PATCH 1/3] t1006: update 'run_tests' to test generic object specifiers

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

"Victoria Dye via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

> From: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
>
> Update the 'run_tests' test wrapper so that the first argument may refer to
> any specifier that uniquely identifies an object (e.g. a ref name,
> '<OID>:<path>', '<OID>^{<type>}', etc.), rather than only a full object ID.
> Also, add a test that uses a non-OID identifier, ensuring appropriate
> parsing in 'cat-file'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> ---
>  t/t1006-cat-file.sh | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t1006-cat-file.sh b/t/t1006-cat-file.sh
> index e0c6482797e..ac1f754ee32 100755
> --- a/t/t1006-cat-file.sh
> +++ b/t/t1006-cat-file.sh
> @@ -112,65 +112,66 @@ strlen () {
>  
>  run_tests () {
>      type=$1
> -    sha1=$2
> +    object_name=$2
> +    oid=$(git rev-parse --verify $object_name)
>      size=$3
>      content=$4
>      pretty_content=$5
>  
> -    batch_output="$sha1 $type $size
> +    batch_output="$oid $type $size
>  $content"

As "object_name" is now allowed to be any name in the 'extended
SHA-1' syntax (cf. Documentation/revisions.txt), you should be a bit
more careful in quoting.

	oid=$(git rev-parse --verify "$object_name")

>      test_expect_success "$type exists" '
> -	git cat-file -e $sha1
> +	git cat-file -e $object_name
>      '

Likewise.  You may not currently use a path with SP in it to name a
tree object, e.g., "HEAD:Read Me.txt", but protecting against such a
pathname is a cheap investment for futureproofing.

Looking good otherwise.  Thanks.