Re: [PATCH 2/2] grep: use grep_and_expr() in compile_pattern_and()

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:

> In a similar spirit as a previous commit, use the new `grep_and_expr()`
> to construct the AND node in `compile_pattern_and()`.
>
> Unlike the aforementioned previous commit, this is not about code
> duplication, since this is the only spot in grep.c where an AND node is
> constructed. Rather, this is about visual consistency with the other
> `compile_pattern_xyz()` functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
> ---
>  grep.c | 11 ++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/grep.c b/grep.c
> index d772fe6cc5..ab4fdacaed 100644
> --- a/grep.c
> +++ b/grep.c
> @@ -619,6 +619,11 @@ static struct grep_expr *grep_or_expr(struct grep_expr *left, struct grep_expr *
>  	return grep_binexp(GREP_NODE_OR, left, right);
>  }
>  
> +static struct grep_expr *grep_and_expr(struct grep_expr *left, struct grep_expr *right)
> +{
> +	return grep_binexp(GREP_NODE_AND, left, right);
> +}
> +
>  static struct grep_expr *compile_pattern_or(struct grep_pat **);
>  static struct grep_expr *compile_pattern_atom(struct grep_pat **list)
>  {
> @@ -687,11 +692,7 @@ static struct grep_expr *compile_pattern_and(struct grep_pat **list)
>  		y = compile_pattern_and(list);
>  		if (!y)
>  			die("--and not followed by pattern expression");
> -		CALLOC_ARRAY(z, 1);
> -		z->node = GREP_NODE_AND;
> -		z->u.binary.left = x;
> -		z->u.binary.right = y;
> -		return z;
> +		return grep_and_expr(x, y);

You'd need to remove 'z' from the function to avoid getting yelled
at by your compiler for unused variable.