From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git v1.9-rc0 Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:10:18 -0800 Message-ID: References: <52DFE882.2040605@atlas-elektronik.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Stefan =?utf-8?Q?N=C3=A4we?= , Javier Domingo Cansino , "git\@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel To: Vicent =?utf-8?Q?Mart=C3=AD?= X-From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 22 19:10:39 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: glk-linux-kernel-3@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W62G6-0003hI-3Y for glk-linux-kernel-3@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 19:10:38 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755564AbaAVSKa convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:10:30 -0500 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:33804 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752845AbaAVSK1 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:10:27 -0500 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484E564340; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:10:26 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=/+zQzF1wTcTO xU3VIm5HW97thEo=; b=hT1rbiqGj3ZA0uGN9Zgplq2ldKAPXkI2+Ci4W8sT7tg8 QU2tLoeVR2hLAv4Tn0qAKWzDc3TkebUoqdMK+30H1/edBgL2IPUIIkmY0skEOi1B NFMuSMyr+FZf/Xcs91P0Aade88J9RIqrX28S9fLWsjd7dxQyGrByjnntyvSGE/c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=jnF5sP 4itRC9xHjE1qXMJweEG38MZzN25bS7s7kGQrKXyKiZCZxvJ5GXpdE8LyjvbFukHO IUaQP+zcaYQkT1+L0qNQH4KvQ/BnVouUkG786RCgVuRk6Vv0UTlO8qjJVZqw8yBu GietZhoj297Svn1cyTa/gMpBzw2MIBNWYmZvc= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B528C6433E; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:10:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [72.14.226.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C86D6433D; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:10:21 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: ("Vicent =?utf-8?Q?Mart=C3=AD=22's?= message of "Wed, 22 Jan 2014 18:26:23 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 750812D6-8390-11E3-B8BB-1B26802839F8-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Vicent Mart=C3=AD writes: >> Do these consume CPU every time somebody asks for a tarball? That >> might be considered "wrong" depending on the view. > > No, our infrastructure caches frequently requested tarballs so they > don't have to be regenerated on the fly. Thanks. That is certainly good enough for consumers, and better than having to manually create and upload for me ;-)