From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] format-patch: introduce format.defaultTo
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 10:42:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqlhythrzq.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389028732-27760-3-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com> (Ramkumar Ramachandra's message of "Mon, 6 Jan 2014 22:48:52 +0530")
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> writes:
> A very common workflow for preparing patches involves working off a
> topic branch and generating patches against 'master' to send off to the
> maintainer. However, a plain
>
> $ git format-patch -o outgoing
>
> is a no-op on a topic branch,...
Two points.
- why is a single branch name sufficient?
- is it a better option to simply default to @{u}, if one exists,
instead of failing?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-06 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-06 17:18 [PATCH 0/2] Minor convinience feature: format.defaultTo Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-06 17:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] completion: complete format.coverLetter Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 11:24 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-06 17:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] format-patch: introduce format.defaultTo Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-06 18:35 ` Jonathan Nieder
2014-01-06 19:02 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-06 18:42 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2014-01-06 18:49 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-06 20:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-06 20:18 ` Jeff King
2014-01-06 20:29 ` John Szakmeister
2014-01-06 20:42 ` Jonathan Nieder
2014-01-06 21:13 ` John Szakmeister
2014-01-06 21:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-06 22:54 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 0:42 ` John Szakmeister
2014-01-07 16:47 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-06 20:43 ` Jeff King
2014-01-06 20:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-06 20:55 ` Jeff King
2014-01-06 21:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-06 22:10 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 20:56 ` Jeff King
2014-01-07 21:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-07 21:24 ` Jeff King
2014-01-07 22:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-07 22:17 ` Jeff King
2014-01-07 22:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-10 19:17 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-01-06 21:59 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-06 22:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-06 22:47 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 21:06 ` Jeff King
2014-01-07 21:25 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-07 21:30 ` Jeff King
2014-04-10 19:20 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-01-06 17:25 ` [PATCH 0/2] Minor convinience feature: format.defaultTo Ramkumar Ramachandra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqlhythrzq.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.