From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, vdye@github.com,
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] git for-each-ref: is-base atom and base branches
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 16:06:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqmslvhmgm.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.1768.git.1722550226.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget's message of "Thu, 01 Aug 2024 22:10:23 +0000")
"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> Derrick Stolee (3):
> commit-reach: add get_branch_base_for_tip
> for-each-ref: add 'is-base' token
> p1500: add is-base performance tests
>
> commit-reach.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> commit-reach.h | 17 ++++++
> ref-filter.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> ref-filter.h | 15 +++++
> t/helper/test-reach.c | 2 +
> t/perf/p1500-graph-walks.sh | 31 ++++++++++
> t/t6600-test-reach.sh | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 7 files changed, 354 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
I was expecting to see an documentation update to for-each-ref (and
probably branch and tag) so that what this new atom means. Is it
that %(is-base:<commit>) interpolates to <commit> for a ref that is an
ancestor of <commit>, and interpolates to an empty string for a ref
that is not, or something?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-01 23:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-01 22:10 [PATCH 0/3] git for-each-ref: is-base atom and base branches Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-08-01 22:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] commit-reach: add get_branch_base_for_tip Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-08-01 22:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] for-each-ref: add 'is-base' token Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-08-01 22:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] p1500: add is-base performance tests Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-08-01 23:06 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-08-02 14:32 ` [PATCH 0/3] git for-each-ref: is-base atom and base branches Derrick Stolee
2024-08-02 16:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-08-02 17:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-08-11 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-08-11 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] commit-reach: add get_branch_base_for_tip Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-08-12 20:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-08-13 13:39 ` Derrick Stolee
2024-08-11 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] for-each-ref: add 'is-base' token Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-08-12 21:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-08-13 13:44 ` Derrick Stolee
2024-08-11 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] p1500: add is-base performance tests Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-08-14 10:31 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] git for-each-ref: is-base atom and base branches Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-08-14 10:31 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] commit-reach: add get_branch_base_for_tip Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-08-14 10:31 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] commit: add gentle reference lookup method Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-08-14 10:31 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] for-each-ref: add 'is-base' token Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-08-14 10:31 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] p1500: add is-base performance tests Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-08-19 19:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] git for-each-ref: is-base atom and base branches Junio C Hamano
2024-08-20 1:33 ` Derrick Stolee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqmslvhmgm.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
--cc=vdye@github.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.